feat(queen): --skip-citation-only, so a bulk run is not limited to specs - #4639
Merged
Merged
Conversation
`--specs-only` reached the 103 issues naming a `.t27`. 64 more name code but no spec and are just as draftable; there was no way to take them without also taking the third group. That group -- 71 issues -- names ONLY a path under `docs/`, and those are the drafts most likely to be wrong: a document is quoted far more often than it is edited. #4122 and #4115 both name `docs/audit/inngest-improvement-plan-2026-09-13.md`, the thing they cite, not the thing they change. `--skip-citation-only` drops an issue whose every path is under `docs/`. One naming a document AND a code path is still drafted: there the document is context and the code is the work. Run over the board: 167 issues now carry a draft, and a re-run posts nothing. The remaining 315 name no path at all, and a guess there would be exactly the wrong boundary this tool exists to avoid. Closes #4638 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
📓 NotebookLM Notebook linked to this PR
This notebook contains session context, decisions, and artifacts for this work. |
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #4638
--specs-onlyreached the 103 issues naming a.t27. 64 more name code but no spec and are just as draftable — there was simply no way to take them without also taking the third group.That third group — 71 issues — names only a path under
docs/. Those are the drafts most likely to be wrong, because a document is quoted far more often than it is edited: #4122 and #4115 both namedocs/audit/inngest-improvement-plan-2026-09-13.md, which is the thing they cite, not the thing they change.--skip-citation-onlydrops an issue whose every path is underdocs/. One naming a document and a code path is still drafted — there the document is context and the code is the work.Result on the board
167 of the 553 unreachable issues now carry a boundary draft. The remaining 315 name no path at all — there is nothing to draft from, and a guess there would be exactly the wrong boundary this tool exists to avoid.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code