Repository navigation
feat(queen): tell the bee how to find what already exists - #4293
Merged
Merged
Conversation
576 of 4021 function bodies in specs/ are byte-identical copies (#4290). The bee that wrote the thirtieth magadd was not careless: its brief named the file, the signatures and the criteria and said nothing about the twenty-nine implementations that already existed, and there was no command it could run to find out. Every issue the feeder writes now carries that command - `--name` for where a function already lives, `--like` for what in this file is written elsewhere - and says what to do with the answer: reuse it with `use module::name;`, which 494 parsing specs already do. Closes #4292 Gates: python3 -m py_compile on the feeder; the rendered PREAMBLE carries both commands and names the ratchet; a --dry-run against master still reports the same reading it did before (28 files hold 146 empty bodies, 0 uncovered). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
gHashTag
enabled auto-merge (squash)
September 20, 2026 06:55
Contributor
Contributor
|
📓 NotebookLM Notebook linked to this PR
This notebook contains session context, decisions, and artifacts for this work. |
gHashTag
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2026
…ot compile (#4297) #4293 added "If it exists, reuse it (`use module::name;`)" to every issue the feeder writes. Measured on a two-spec minimal case: both `use m::f;` and `use m;` generate the comment "no references in this module", no @import and an unqualified call, and zig answers "use of undeclared identifier". spec-status calls that same file IMPLEMENTED, so the advice passes the cheap gate and fails the oracle. The brief now says what is true: do not copy, do not try to import, name the file and line where the function lives, implement only what this spec asks. Closes #4296 Gates: python3 -m py_compile; the rendered PREAMBLE carries the corrected sentence; the minimal case that proves it is quoted in the issue. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #4292
The other half of #4290: the gate stops new copies, this stops the bee needing one. Every issue the feeder writes now carries
dupe_scan --nameand--like, and says to reuse withuse module::name;.🤖 Generated with Claude Code