docs(specs): viewport spec notes the two-row phone rail of trinity#1032 - #3834
Merged
gHashTag merged 1 commit intoSep 16, 2026
Merged
Conversation
specs/ui/viewport.t27 measured the Queen rail at 390x844 on 2026-09-09 as a horizontal strip with about six of twelve tiles visible and pinned RAIL_* to that reading. Since gHashTag/trinity#1032 (2026-09-16) a portrait phone lays the rail out as a grid of two rows, every tile in view, and the head's tool row wraps instead of scrolling; the strip is the layout from 641 to 900 px wide only, and the rail carries thirteen views since TRI. The SOURCE section and the rail-capacity section say so next to what they described. No constant, test or assert changes. Refs gHashTag#3557 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
gHashTag
pushed a commit
to gHashTag/trinity
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2026
…rail (#1033) The copy of specs/ui/viewport.t27 follows gHashTag/t27#3834: a dated note that a portrait phone lays the Queen rail out as a grid of two rows since #1032, with every tile in view, and that the RAIL_* numbers are the c881e7f reading of the 641-900px strip. Comments only, so viewport.generated.ts and viewport.generated.css change in their embedded spec hash and in nothing else (node scripts/viewport-from-spec.mjs; check:viewport up to date; test:viewport-spec 8/8). Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
github-actions Bot
added a commit
to gHashTag/trinity
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2026
docs(website): vendor the viewport spec that notes the two-row phone rail (#1033) The copy of specs/ui/viewport.t27 follows gHashTag/t27#3834: a dated note that a portrait phone lays the Queen rail out as a grid of two rows since #1032, with every tile in view, and that the RAIL_* numbers are the c881e7f reading of the 641-900px strip. Comments only, so viewport.generated.ts and viewport.generated.css change in their embedded spec hash and in nothing else (node scripts/viewport-from-spec.mjs; check:viewport up to date; test:viewport-spec 8/8). Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
specs/ui/viewport.t27measured the Queen rail at 390x844 on 2026-09-09 as "a horizontal strip, 12 tiles of 44x74, about 6 visible" and pinnedRAIL_*to that reading ("described, not changed here"). The owner's phone showed the strip's cost on 2026-09-16 (six and a half tiles in view, the rest past an edge that gives no sign it can be dragged), and gHashTag/trinity#1032 lays the rail out as a grid of two rows on portrait phones (max-width: 640px,queen-phone.css): ceil(views / 2) columns, every tile at least 44 px and in view, nothing scrolling; the head's tool row wraps instead of scrolling.This PR makes the spec say so where it described the strip: a dated note in the SOURCE section next to the measurement it supersedes, and a sentence in the rail-capacity section stating what its numbers are — the c881e7f reading, with thirteen views on the rail since TRI joined it (
HUD_KEYS[12] = r), the compact strip now the layout from 641 to 900 px wide only. Comments only: no constant, test or assert changes, soRAIL_TILESstays 12 andRAIL_MIN_VISIBLEstays 6 (met with every tile on a portrait phone). The site'sviewport.generated.ts/.cssfollow when the copy is re-vendored (companion PR in gHashTag/trinity: the values stay, the embedded spec hash changes).Checks (local, this branch)
t27c check specs/ui/viewport.t27: Typecheck OK;check_specs_parse,check_specs_generate(1011 specs, 931 generate, 80 known-broken): OK;published_figures.py --check: exit 0;t27c ci --repo-root .: 114 issues, the same as master.docs/now/2026-09-16-the-viewport-spec-follows-the-two-row-phone-rail.md.gen-driftseals underspecs/base/*and elsewhere on this host (gen_hash_cdiffers from the sealed value; the spec files hash the same);ui/viewport.t27has no seal and is not among them..queen27-hud-command.is-compactscrollWidth == clientWidth, 13 of 13 tiles inside the rail. Not measured: a physical phone.Refs #3557 (the issue the viewport spec was written under).
Do not merge without the owner's approval.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code