Conversation
No behaviour changes. Establishes whether server-tools was already red before the verdict-matching fix in #472, since the Tests workflow has no prior run on this branch to compare against. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
✅ Tests passed — 2057/2088
|
Owner
Author
|
Answer recorded: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft, not for merge. Comment-only change to
queen-tick.tsso the Tests workflow's path filter fires with no behaviour change.Tests / server-toolsfailed on #472 and the workflow has no prior run on this branch to compare against, so "already red" could not be asserted from history. This dates it: if server-tools fails here too, the failure predates the verdict-matching fix.Close and delete once the answer is recorded.