Skip to content

test(ci): control branch to date the server-tools failure - #474

Closed
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/queen-supervisorfrom
loop/ci-control-server-tools
Closed

gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/queen-supervisorfrom
loop/ci-control-server-tools

Conversation

@gHashTag

@gHashTag gHashTag commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Draft, not for merge. Comment-only change to queen-tick.ts so the Tests workflow's path filter fires with no behaviour change.

Tests / server-tools failed on #472 and the workflow has no prior run on this branch to compare against, so "already red" could not be asserted from history. This dates it: if server-tools fails here too, the failure predates the verdict-matching fix.

Close and delete once the answer is recorded.

No behaviour changes. Establishes whether server-tools was already red before the verdict-matching fix in #472, since the Tests workflow has no prior run on this branch to compare against.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the test label Sep 6, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Tests passed — 2057/2088

Suite Passed Failed Skipped
agent 87/87 0 0
build 9/9 0 0
cdp-protocol 5/5 0 0
eval 93/93 0 0
server-agent 272/272 0 0
server-api 944/974 0 30
server-browser 6/6 0 0
server-integration 10/11 0 1
server-lib 273/273 0 0
server-pglive 3/3 0 0
server-root 68/68 0 0
server-skills 31/31 0 0
server-tools 242/242 0 0
shared 14/14 0 0

View workflow run

@gHashTag

gHashTag commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Answer recorded: server-tools passed here on a comment-only change, so it is not already red. Re-running the identical commit on #472 then passed as well — same SHA, one fail and one pass, and the failure was a harness crash (browser/dbus, "Test run failed before JUnit output was written") rather than an assertion. Not attributable to the verdict-matching change; recorded as a measurement, not diagnosed as flake.

@gHashTag gHashTag closed this Sep 6, 2026
@gHashTag
gHashTag deleted the loop/ci-control-server-tools branch September 6, 2026 05:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant