Repository navigation
[HOLD] 📘 Glossary update - 2026-11-12 (replaces #1092) - #1122
richarddushime wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
_renamed_terms.json carries the German aliases from #1092 (ba618d2) and adds the current addresses of 30 Arabic terms whose titles changed in the Glossary sheet (leading English acronyms dropped, team rewordings). The term files are regenerated so each renamed page lists its old addresses as aliases. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
✅ Staging Deployment Status This PR has been successfully deployed to staging as part of an aggregated deployment. Deployed at: 2026-11-13 12:30:41 UTC The staging site shows the combined state of all compatible open PRs. |
📝 Spell Check ResultsFound 2 potential spelling issue(s) when checking 71 changed file(s): 📄
|
| Line | Issue |
|---|---|
| 55 | Asai ==> Asia |
| 86 | Wit ==> With |
ℹ️ How to address these issues:
- Fix the typo: If it's a genuine typo, please correct it.
- Add to whitelist: If it's a valid word (e.g., a name, technical term), add it to
.codespell-ignore.txt - False positive: If this is a false positive, please report it in the PR comments.
🤖 This check was performed by codespell
|
👍 All image files/references (if any) are in webp format, in line with our policy. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
13 issues found and verified against the latest diff
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الفرضية_المساعدة.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الفرضية_المساعدة.md:6">
P3: Since this definition line is being rewritten anyway, fix the typo "لايتم" to "لا يتم" and collapse the double spaces after "ومع ذلك" and "التنبؤات".</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/إنهاء_الاستعمار.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/إنهاء_الاستعمار.md:6">
P3: The rewritten `definition` still has two missing-space typos: "داخلفي" should be "داخل الجامعات" (confirm wording with the translator), and "الأفرادالناس" should be split or reduced to one word. Fix them while this line is being revised.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الخطأ_من_الن_وع_الأو_ل.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الخطأ_من_الن_وع_الأو_ل.md:11">
P2: Use the plain title `p-value` here. The `*p*` emphasis markers are not stripped by the related-terms lookup, so the link to the English p-value page breaks and literal asterisks render.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الت_حالف_الت_أليفي.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الت_حالف_الت_أليفي.md:13">
P2: The Tierney et al. (2020) reference still truncates the author list with `et al.` after six authors. Per the team's APA rule, list every author when there are 20 or fewer. Please check the full author list against the DOI and include all authors. The same applies to the 2021 Tierney entry.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/القيمة_الاحتمالي_ة.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/القيمة_الاحتمالي_ة.md:6">
P3: The rewritten definition still contains two invisible zero-width spaces (U+200B) in "متوسط الفرق فيالعينة". Since this PR is a formatting cleanup, remove them.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الث_لاثي_المقلق.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الث_لاثي_المقلق.md:11">
P2: Changing this to `*p*-hacking` breaks the related-term link. The layout slugifies the term to `p__hacking`, which matches no glossary page, so the link is dropped and literal asterisks are shown. Revert to `p-hacking`, which resolves to the English `p_hacking` page.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الص_دق_الخارجي.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الص_دق_الخارجي.md:6">
P2: The alternate-definition related terms (صدق المحك؛ الصلاحية التقاربية؛ الصلاحية الانفصالية) were deleted rather than moved. Move them into `alt_related_terms` (currently `[null]`), or restore them at the end of the definition.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/المواد_المفتوحة.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/المواد_المفتوحة.md:18">
P3: The Blohowiak reference still truncates the author list, now with `et al.` instead of `& others`. APA 7 reference lists name all authors up to 20, so list the full author list here.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/بنية_بيانات_تصوير_الد_ماغ.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/بنية_بيانات_تصوير_الد_ماغ.md:11">
P3: APA 7 reference lists don't use "et al." in the author list. For a 21+ author paper, list the first 19 authors, then "...", then the final author. Please restore the full author list in that form.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/شارات_العلوم_المفتوحة.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/شارات_العلوم_المفتوحة.md:17">
P3: The last reference has the wrong author: "Science, C." should be "Center for Open Science". Correct the author in this reference.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/المعامل_المتعد_دة.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/المعامل_المتعد_دة.md:6">
P3: The revised definition still publishes the unfinished marker `[update pending]`. Replace it with the intended content or remove the placeholder before generating this page.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/علم_المواطن.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/علم_المواطن.md:6">
P3: This cleanup leaves a stray `ال` before the alternative-definition label, so the page renders `ال التَّعريف البديل`. Remove that leftover prefix.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/درجات_حر_ي_ة_الباحث.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/درجات_حر_ي_ة_الباحث.md:12">
P2: Reverting this related term to plain `p-hacking`. The `*p*` emphasis markup breaks the link lookup: the template slugifies it to `p__hacking`, which matches no glossary page, so the term renders as plain text with literal asterisks instead of a link.</violation>
</file>
Note: This PR contains a large number of files. cubic selects up to 200 of the highest-priority eligible files for this review, so some files may not have been reviewed.
View guided diff | Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic
| "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)", | ||
| "Null Result", | ||
| "p-value", | ||
| "*p*-value", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: Use the plain title p-value here. The *p* emphasis markers are not stripped by the related-terms lookup, so the link to the English p-value page breaks and literal asterisks render.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/الخطأ_من_الن_وع_الأو_ل.md, line 11:
<comment>Use the plain title `p-value` here. The `*p*` emphasis markers are not stripped by the related-terms lookup, so the link to the English p-value page breaks and literal asterisks render.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
"Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)",
"Null Result",
- "p-value",
+ "*p*-value",
"Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)",
"Reproducibility crisis (aka Replicability or replication crisis)",
</file context>
| "*p*-value", | |
| "p-value", |
| "Model uncertainty", | ||
| "Multiverse analysis", | ||
| "p-hacking", | ||
| "*p*-hacking", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: Reverting this related term to plain p-hacking. The *p* emphasis markup breaks the link lookup: the template slugifies it to p__hacking, which matches no glossary page, so the term renders as plain text with literal asterisks instead of a link.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/درجات_حر_ي_ة_الباحث.md, line 12:
<comment>Reverting this related term to plain `p-hacking`. The `*p*` emphasis markup breaks the link lookup: the template slugifies it to `p__hacking`, which matches no glossary page, so the term renders as plain text with literal asterisks instead of a link.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,18 +3,18 @@
"Model uncertainty",
"Multiverse analysis",
- "p-hacking",
+ "*p*-hacking",
"Robustness (analyses)",
"Specification curve analysis"
</file context>
| "*p*-hacking", | |
| "p-hacking", |
| "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. <i>Science</i>, <i>349</i>(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", | ||
| "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. <i>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</i>, <i>161</i>, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", | ||
| "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" | ||
| "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., et al. (2020). Creative destruction in science. <i>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</i>, <i>161</i>, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: The Tierney et al. (2020) reference still truncates the author list with et al. after six authors. Per the team's APA rule, list every author when there are 20 or fewer. Please check the full author list against the DOI and include all authors. The same applies to the 2021 Tierney entry.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/الت_حالف_الت_أليفي.md, line 13:
<comment>The Tierney et al. (2020) reference still truncates the author list with `et al.` after six authors. Per the team's APA rule, list every author when there are 20 or fewer. Please check the full author list against the DOI and include all authors. The same applies to the 2021 Tierney entry.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,15 +3,15 @@
"Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. <i>Science</i>, <i>349</i>(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716",
- "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. <i>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</i>, <i>161</i>, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002",
- "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060"
+ "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., et al. (2020). Creative destruction in science. <i>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</i>, <i>161</i>, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002",
+ "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., et al. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060"
],
</file context>
| "Reproducibility", | ||
| "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)", | ||
| "p-hacking", | ||
| "*p*-hacking", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: Changing this to *p*-hacking breaks the related-term link. The layout slugifies the term to p__hacking, which matches no glossary page, so the link is dropped and literal asterisks are shown. Revert to p-hacking, which resolves to the English p_hacking page.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/الث_لاثي_المقلق.md, line 11:
<comment>Changing this to `*p*-hacking` breaks the related-term link. The layout slugifies the term to `p__hacking`, which matches no glossary page, so the link is dropped and literal asterisks are shown. Revert to `p-hacking`, which resolves to the English `p_hacking` page.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
"Reproducibility",
"Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)",
- "p-hacking",
+ "*p*-hacking",
"Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)"
],
</file context>
| "*p*-hacking", | |
| "p-hacking", |
| "title": "الصّدق الخارجي [External Validity]", | ||
| "sort_key": "الصّدق الخارجي [external validity]", | ||
| "definition": "التعريف:** يشير إلى إمكانية تعميم نتائج دراسة علمية ما على سياقات أخرى خارج سياق الدراسة (مثلا مقاييس مختلفة، بيئات مختلفة، أشخاص مختلفين، بيئات مختلفة، أوقات مختلفة). من الناحية الإحصائية، قد يكون ما يهدد الصدق الخارجي تفاعلات معينة مثل أن يكون تأثير عامل معين (المتغير المستقل) معتمدا على عامل آخر (المتغير الدخيل). قد يكون الصدق الخارجي محدوداً بسبب تصميم الدراسة (ككونها في بيئة معملية، كون عينة الدراسة لا تمثل المجتمع). **المصطلحات ذات العلاقة:** قيود التعميم، الصدق الداخلي، القابلية للتعميم، التمثيل، الصدق **التعريف البديل:** في سياق علم القياس النفسي، فإن الصدق الخارجي هو درجة الأدلة التي تؤكد العلاقات بين بنية نفسية تم اختبارها والمتغيرات الخارجية. **المصطلحات المرتبطة بالتعريف البديل:** صدق المحك؛ الصلاحية التقاربية؛ الصلاحية الانفصالية", | ||
| "definition": "يشير إلى إمكانية تعميم نتائج دراسة علمية ما على سياقات أخرى خارج سياق الدراسة (مثلا مقاييس مختلفة، بيئات مختلفة، أشخاص مختلفين، بيئات مختلفة، أوقات مختلفة). من الناحية الإحصائية، قد يكون ما يهدد الصدق الخارجي تفاعلات معينة مثل أن يكون تأثير عامل معين (المتغير المستقل) معتمدا على عامل آخر (المتغير الدخيل). قد يكون الصدق الخارجي محدوداً بسبب تصميم الدراسة (ككونها في بيئة معملية، كون عينة الدراسة لا تمثل المجتمع). **التعريف البديل:** في سياق علم القياس النفسي، فإن الصدق الخارجي هو درجة الأدلة التي تؤكد العلاقات بين بنية نفسية تم اختبارها والمتغيرات الخارجية.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: The alternate-definition related terms (صدق المحك؛ الصلاحية التقاربية؛ الصلاحية الانفصالية) were deleted rather than moved. Move them into alt_related_terms (currently [null]), or restore them at the end of the definition.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/الص_دق_الخارجي.md, line 6:
<comment>The alternate-definition related terms (صدق المحك؛ الصلاحية التقاربية؛ الصلاحية الانفصالية) were deleted rather than moved. Move them into `alt_related_terms` (currently `[null]`), or restore them at the end of the definition.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"title": "الصّدق الخارجي [External Validity]",
"sort_key": "الصّدق الخارجي [external validity]",
- "definition": "التعريف:** يشير إلى إمكانية تعميم نتائج دراسة علمية ما على سياقات أخرى خارج سياق الدراسة (مثلا مقاييس مختلفة، بيئات مختلفة، أشخاص مختلفين، بيئات مختلفة، أوقات مختلفة). من الناحية الإحصائية، قد يكون ما يهدد الصدق الخارجي تفاعلات معينة مثل أن يكون تأثير عامل معين (المتغير المستقل) معتمدا على عامل آخر (المتغير الدخيل). قد يكون الصدق الخارجي محدوداً بسبب تصميم الدراسة (ككونها في بيئة معملية، كون عينة الدراسة لا تمثل المجتمع). **المصطلحات ذات العلاقة:** قيود التعميم، الصدق الداخلي، القابلية للتعميم، التمثيل، الصدق **التعريف البديل:** في سياق علم القياس النفسي، فإن الصدق الخارجي هو درجة الأدلة التي تؤكد العلاقات بين بنية نفسية تم اختبارها والمتغيرات الخارجية. **المصطلحات المرتبطة بالتعريف البديل:** صدق المحك؛ الصلاحية التقاربية؛ الصلاحية الانفصالية",
+ "definition": "يشير إلى إمكانية تعميم نتائج دراسة علمية ما على سياقات أخرى خارج سياق الدراسة (مثلا مقاييس مختلفة، بيئات مختلفة، أشخاص مختلفين، بيئات مختلفة، أوقات مختلفة). من الناحية الإحصائية، قد يكون ما يهدد الصدق الخارجي تفاعلات معينة مثل أن يكون تأثير عامل معين (المتغير المستقل) معتمدا على عامل آخر (المتغير الدخيل). قد يكون الصدق الخارجي محدوداً بسبب تصميم الدراسة (ككونها في بيئة معملية، كون عينة الدراسة لا تمثل المجتمع). **التعريف البديل:** في سياق علم القياس النفسي، فإن الصدق الخارجي هو درجة الأدلة التي تؤكد العلاقات بين بنية نفسية تم اختبارها والمتغيرات الخارجية.",
"related_terms": [
"Constraints on Generality (COG)",
</file context>
| "definition": "يشير إلى إمكانية تعميم نتائج دراسة علمية ما على سياقات أخرى خارج سياق الدراسة (مثلا مقاييس مختلفة، بيئات مختلفة، أشخاص مختلفين، بيئات مختلفة، أوقات مختلفة). من الناحية الإحصائية، قد يكون ما يهدد الصدق الخارجي تفاعلات معينة مثل أن يكون تأثير عامل معين (المتغير المستقل) معتمدا على عامل آخر (المتغير الدخيل). قد يكون الصدق الخارجي محدوداً بسبب تصميم الدراسة (ككونها في بيئة معملية، كون عينة الدراسة لا تمثل المجتمع). **التعريف البديل:** في سياق علم القياس النفسي، فإن الصدق الخارجي هو درجة الأدلة التي تؤكد العلاقات بين بنية نفسية تم اختبارها والمتغيرات الخارجية.", | |
| "definition": "يشير إلى إمكانية تعميم نتائج دراسة علمية ما على سياقات أخرى خارج سياق الدراسة (مثلا مقاييس مختلفة، بيئات مختلفة، أشخاص مختلفين، بيئات مختلفة، أوقات مختلفة). من الناحية الإحصائية، قد يكون ما يهدد الصدق الخارجي تفاعلات معينة مثل أن يكون تأثير عامل معين (المتغير المستقل) معتمدا على عامل آخر (المتغير الدخيل). قد يكون الصدق الخارجي محدوداً بسبب تصميم الدراسة (ككونها في بيئة معملية، كون عينة الدراسة لا تمثل المجتمع). **التعريف البديل:** في سياق علم القياس النفسي، فإن الصدق الخارجي هو درجة الأدلة التي تؤكد العلاقات بين بنية نفسية تم اختبارها والمتغيرات الخارجية. **المصطلحات المرتبطة بالتعريف البديل:** صدق المحك؛ الصلاحية التقاربية؛ الصلاحية الانفصالية", |
| ], | ||
| "references": [ | ||
| "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). <i>Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices</i>. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", | ||
| "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., et al. (2020). <i>Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices</i>. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: The Blohowiak reference still truncates the author list, now with et al. instead of & others. APA 7 reference lists name all authors up to 20, so list the full author list here.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/المواد_المفتوحة.md, line 18:
<comment>The Blohowiak reference still truncates the author list, now with `et al.` instead of `& others`. APA 7 reference lists name all authors up to 20, so list the full author list here.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
],
"references": [
- "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). <i>Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices</i>. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz",
+ "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., et al. (2020). <i>Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices</i>. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz",
"Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. <i>PLoS Biology</i>, <i>14</i>(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456"
],
</file context>
| "references": [ | ||
| "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. <i>Scientific Data</i>, <i>3</i>, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", | ||
| "BIDS. (2020). <i>About BIDS</i>. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" | ||
| "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., et al. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. <i>Scientific Data</i>, <i>3</i>, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: APA 7 reference lists don't use "et al." in the author list. For a 21+ author paper, list the first 19 authors, then "...", then the final author. Please restore the full author list in that form.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/بنية_بيانات_تصوير_الد_ماغ.md, line 11:
<comment>APA 7 reference lists don't use "et al." in the author list. For a 21+ author paper, list the first 19 authors, then "...", then the final author. Please restore the full author list in that form.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,13 +3,14 @@
"references": [
- "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. <i>Scientific Data</i>, <i>3</i>, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44",
- "BIDS. (2020). <i>About BIDS</i>. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io"
+ "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., et al. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. <i>Scientific Data</i>, <i>3</i>, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44",
+ "BIDS. (2020). <i>About BIDS</i>. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io",
+ "Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., & Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. <i>Scientific Data</i>, <i>6</i>(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8"
</file context>
| "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., deMayo, B. E., Long, B., Yoon, E. J., & Frank, M. C. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. <i>Royal Society Open Science</i>, <i>8</i>(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", | ||
| "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. <i>PLoS Biology</i>, <i>14</i>(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", | ||
| "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. <i>Royal Society Open Science</i>, <i>7</i>(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", | ||
| "Science, C. (n.d.). <i>Open science badges</i>. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: The last reference has the wrong author: "Science, C." should be "Center for Open Science". Correct the author in this reference.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/شارات_العلوم_المفتوحة.md, line 17:
<comment>The last reference has the wrong author: "Science, C." should be "Center for Open Science". Correct the author in this reference.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+ "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., deMayo, B. E., Long, B., Yoon, E. J., & Frank, M. C. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. <i>Royal Society Open Science</i>, <i>8</i>(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494",
+ "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. <i>PLoS Biology</i>, <i>14</i>(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456",
+ "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. <i>Royal Society Open Science</i>, <i>7</i>(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818",
+ "Science, C. (n.d.). <i>Open science badges</i>. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges"
+ ],
+ "drafted_by": [
</file context>
| "Science, C. (n.d.). <i>Open science badges</i>. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" | |
| "Center for Open Science. (n.d.). <i>Open science badges</i>. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" |
| "title": "المعامل المتعدِّدة [Many Labs]", | ||
| "sort_key": "المعامل المتعدِّدة [many labs]", | ||
| "definition": "التّعريف:** مبادرة بقيادة فريق التَّعاون العلميّ المفتوح عام 2015 حيث إنَّ مئات المجموعات البحثيَّة من مختلف الجامعات كرَّرت عددًا من الدِّراسات المنشورة ذات نسبة تأثير عاليَة. عرفت هذه المبادرة بـ \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 1\" وتلاها مشروع \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 2\" الذي قام بتقييم التَّباين في نتائج الدِّراسات المكرَّرة عبر العيّنات، والسِّياقات المختلفة. وهناك مشاريع مشابهة مثل \"العديد من الأطفال\" و \"العديد من تخطيطات الدِّماغ الكهربائيَّة\" ومسرع العلوم النَّفسيَّة. [update pending] **المصطلحات ذات الصِّلة: التَّعاون، العديد من المحلِّلين، المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 1، المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 2، التَّعاون العلميّ المفتوح، التِّكرار.", | ||
| "definition": "مبادرة بقيادة فريق التَّعاون العلميّ المفتوح عام 2015 حيث إنَّ مئات المجموعات البحثيَّة من مختلف الجامعات كرَّرت عددًا من الدِّراسات المنشورة ذات نسبة تأثير عاليَة. عرفت هذه المبادرة بـ \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 1\" وتلاها مشروع \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 2\" الذي قام بتقييم التَّباين في نتائج الدِّراسات المكرَّرة عبر العيّنات، والسِّياقات المختلفة. وهناك مشاريع مشابهة مثل \"العديد من الأطفال\" و \"العديد من تخطيطات الدِّماغ الكهربائيَّة\" ومسرع العلوم النَّفسيَّة. [update pending]", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: The revised definition still publishes the unfinished marker [update pending]. Replace it with the intended content or remove the placeholder before generating this page.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/المعامل_المتعد_دة.md, line 6:
<comment>The revised definition still publishes the unfinished marker `[update pending]`. Replace it with the intended content or remove the placeholder before generating this page.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"title": "المعامل المتعدِّدة [Many Labs]",
"sort_key": "المعامل المتعدِّدة [many labs]",
- "definition": "التّعريف:** مبادرة بقيادة فريق التَّعاون العلميّ المفتوح عام 2015 حيث إنَّ مئات المجموعات البحثيَّة من مختلف الجامعات كرَّرت عددًا من الدِّراسات المنشورة ذات نسبة تأثير عاليَة. عرفت هذه المبادرة بـ \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 1\" وتلاها مشروع \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 2\" الذي قام بتقييم التَّباين في نتائج الدِّراسات المكرَّرة عبر العيّنات، والسِّياقات المختلفة. وهناك مشاريع مشابهة مثل \"العديد من الأطفال\" و \"العديد من تخطيطات الدِّماغ الكهربائيَّة\" ومسرع العلوم النَّفسيَّة. [update pending] **المصطلحات ذات الصِّلة: التَّعاون، العديد من المحلِّلين، المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 1، المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 2، التَّعاون العلميّ المفتوح، التِّكرار.",
+ "definition": "مبادرة بقيادة فريق التَّعاون العلميّ المفتوح عام 2015 حيث إنَّ مئات المجموعات البحثيَّة من مختلف الجامعات كرَّرت عددًا من الدِّراسات المنشورة ذات نسبة تأثير عاليَة. عرفت هذه المبادرة بـ \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 1\" وتلاها مشروع \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 2\" الذي قام بتقييم التَّباين في نتائج الدِّراسات المكرَّرة عبر العيّنات، والسِّياقات المختلفة. وهناك مشاريع مشابهة مثل \"العديد من الأطفال\" و \"العديد من تخطيطات الدِّماغ الكهربائيَّة\" ومسرع العلوم النَّفسيَّة. [update pending]",
"related_terms": [
"Collaboration",
</file context>
| "definition": "مبادرة بقيادة فريق التَّعاون العلميّ المفتوح عام 2015 حيث إنَّ مئات المجموعات البحثيَّة من مختلف الجامعات كرَّرت عددًا من الدِّراسات المنشورة ذات نسبة تأثير عاليَة. عرفت هذه المبادرة بـ \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 1\" وتلاها مشروع \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 2\" الذي قام بتقييم التَّباين في نتائج الدِّراسات المكرَّرة عبر العيّنات، والسِّياقات المختلفة. وهناك مشاريع مشابهة مثل \"العديد من الأطفال\" و \"العديد من تخطيطات الدِّماغ الكهربائيَّة\" ومسرع العلوم النَّفسيَّة. [update pending]", | |
| "definition": "مبادرة بقيادة فريق التَّعاون العلميّ المفتوح عام 2015 حيث إنَّ مئات المجموعات البحثيَّة من مختلف الجامعات كرَّرت عددًا من الدِّراسات المنشورة ذات نسبة تأثير عاليَة. عرفت هذه المبادرة بـ \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 1\" وتلاها مشروع \"المعامل المتعدِّدة رقم 2\" الذي قام بتقييم التَّباين في نتائج الدِّراسات المكرَّرة عبر العيّنات، والسِّياقات المختلفة. وهناك مشاريع مشابهة مثل \"العديد من الأطفال\" و \"العديد من تخطيطات الدِّماغ الكهربائيَّة\" ومسرع العلوم النَّفسيَّة.", |
| "title": "علم المواطن [Citizen Science]", | ||
| "sort_key": "علم المواطن [citizen science]", | ||
| "definition": "يشير مصطلح علم المواطن إلى المشاريع العلميَّة التي تتضمَّن مشاركة فعَّالة من قبل الجمهور في المساعي العلميَّة بهدف إضفاء الطَّابع الدِّيمقراطي على العلوم. يمكن أن يشارك العلماء المواطنون في جميع مراحل البحث، حيث يعملون كمتعاونين، أو مساهمين أو قادة مشاريع. من الأمثلة على مشروع علمي كبير للمواطنين هو تحديد الأفراد للأجسام الفلكيَّة (Lintott, 2008). ال**مصطلحات ذات الصِّلة:** علم الحشود، توظيف الجماهير. التَّعريف البديل: (إن أمكن) في الماضي كان علم المواطن يشير في الغالب إلى المتطوعين الذين يشاركون كمساعدين ميدانيين في الدِّراسات العلميَّة (Cohn, 2008, p. 193).", | ||
| "definition": "يشير مصطلح علم المواطن إلى المشاريع العلميَّة التي تتضمَّن مشاركة فعَّالة من قبل الجمهور في المساعي العلميَّة بهدف إضفاء الطَّابع الدِّيمقراطي على العلوم. يمكن أن يشارك العلماء المواطنون في جميع مراحل البحث، حيث يعملون كمتعاونين، أو مساهمين أو قادة مشاريع. من الأمثلة على مشروع علمي كبير للمواطنين هو تحديد الأفراد للأجسام الفلكيَّة (Lintott, 2008). ال التَّعريف البديل: (إن أمكن) في الماضي كان علم المواطن يشير في الغالب إلى المتطوعين الذين يشاركون كمساعدين ميدانيين في الدِّراسات العلميَّة (Cohn, 2008, p. 193).", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: This cleanup leaves a stray ال before the alternative-definition label, so the page renders ال التَّعريف البديل. Remove that leftover prefix.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/علم_المواطن.md, line 6:
<comment>This cleanup leaves a stray `ال` before the alternative-definition label, so the page renders `ال التَّعريف البديل`. Remove that leftover prefix.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"title": "علم المواطن [Citizen Science]",
"sort_key": "علم المواطن [citizen science]",
- "definition": "يشير مصطلح علم المواطن إلى المشاريع العلميَّة التي تتضمَّن مشاركة فعَّالة من قبل الجمهور في المساعي العلميَّة بهدف إضفاء الطَّابع الدِّيمقراطي على العلوم. يمكن أن يشارك العلماء المواطنون في جميع مراحل البحث، حيث يعملون كمتعاونين، أو مساهمين أو قادة مشاريع. من الأمثلة على مشروع علمي كبير للمواطنين هو تحديد الأفراد للأجسام الفلكيَّة (Lintott, 2008). ال**مصطلحات ذات الصِّلة:** علم الحشود، توظيف الجماهير. التَّعريف البديل: (إن أمكن) في الماضي كان علم المواطن يشير في الغالب إلى المتطوعين الذين يشاركون كمساعدين ميدانيين في الدِّراسات العلميَّة (Cohn, 2008, p. 193).",
+ "definition": "يشير مصطلح علم المواطن إلى المشاريع العلميَّة التي تتضمَّن مشاركة فعَّالة من قبل الجمهور في المساعي العلميَّة بهدف إضفاء الطَّابع الدِّيمقراطي على العلوم. يمكن أن يشارك العلماء المواطنون في جميع مراحل البحث، حيث يعملون كمتعاونين، أو مساهمين أو قادة مشاريع. من الأمثلة على مشروع علمي كبير للمواطنين هو تحديد الأفراد للأجسام الفلكيَّة (Lintott, 2008). ال التَّعريف البديل: (إن أمكن) في الماضي كان علم المواطن يشير في الغالب إلى المتطوعين الذين يشاركون كمساعدين ميدانيين في الدِّراسات العلميَّة (Cohn, 2008, p. 193).",
"related_terms": [
"Crowd science",
</file context>
| "definition": "يشير مصطلح علم المواطن إلى المشاريع العلميَّة التي تتضمَّن مشاركة فعَّالة من قبل الجمهور في المساعي العلميَّة بهدف إضفاء الطَّابع الدِّيمقراطي على العلوم. يمكن أن يشارك العلماء المواطنون في جميع مراحل البحث، حيث يعملون كمتعاونين، أو مساهمين أو قادة مشاريع. من الأمثلة على مشروع علمي كبير للمواطنين هو تحديد الأفراد للأجسام الفلكيَّة (Lintott, 2008). ال التَّعريف البديل: (إن أمكن) في الماضي كان علم المواطن يشير في الغالب إلى المتطوعين الذين يشاركون كمساعدين ميدانيين في الدِّراسات العلميَّة (Cohn, 2008, p. 193).", | |
| "definition": "يشير مصطلح علم المواطن إلى المشاريع العلميَّة التي تتضمَّن مشاركة فعَّالة من قبل الجمهور في المساعي العلميَّة بهدف إضفاء الطَّابع الدِّيمقراطي على العلوم. يمكن أن يشارك العلماء المواطنون في جميع مراحل البحث، حيث يعملون كمتعاونين، أو مساهمين أو قادة مشاريع. من الأمثلة على مشروع علمي كبير للمواطنين هو تحديد الأفراد للأجسام الفلكيَّة (Lintott, 2008). التَّعريف البديل: (إن أمكن) في الماضي كان علم المواطن يشير في الغالب إلى المتطوعين الذين يشاركون كمساعدين ميدانيين في الدِّراسات العلميَّة (Cohn, 2008, p. 193).", |
…omma-joined related terms Regenerated from the Glossary sheet after two more source fixes: - Arabic uses التحليل التلوي (and its plural and adjective forms) for meta-analysis in every definition and in the Psychometric meta-analysis title; التحليل البعدي is left for Post Hoc only. The old Psychometric meta-analysis address is kept as an alias. - The DOI, Open Scholarship Knowledge Base and Post Hoc related terms were joined by commas, so several terms showed as one; they are now separate (closes #1124). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
5 existing issues remain and 7 new issues found across 492 files
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الت_لاعب_بالن_ظام.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الت_لاعب_بالن_ظام.md:10">
P2: Keep the related term as the plain title `p-hacking`. The `*p*` markup is not rendered in related terms: the lookup slug becomes `p__hacking`, so the link to the English p-hacking page breaks and the literal asterisks are shown.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الإسهام.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الإسهام.md:16">
P2: The new Harris et al. (2020) reference looks truncated. The NumPy Nature paper has about 26 authors, and this entry stops at Gérard-Marchant without the remaining authors or the final author, Oliphant. Verify against the DOI record and use the APA 7 form for 21+ authors (first 19, ellipsis, final author). The same list is copied into apa_lookup.json and the other-language glossary files.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الد_لالة_الإحصائي_ة.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الد_لالة_الإحصائي_ة.md:12">
P3: `*p*-value` is Markdown emphasis, but related terms are rendered as raw HTML link text, so the asterisks will show literally. Use the plain title `p-value`; it still resolves to the English `p_value` page.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/برنامج_قوة_جي.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/برنامج_قوة_جي.md:6">
P2: Removing the inline Arabic related-terms line leaves the Arabic page with only the English related-term labels from `related_terms`. The translated Arabic names (تحليل القوة، تبرير حجم العينة، تخطيط حجم العينة، القوة الإحصائيَّة) are no longer shown anywhere. If the structured field is meant to replace this line, confirm that English labels on an Arabic page are acceptable. Otherwise, keep the Arabic terms, for example by adding them to the rendered output.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الإيقاف_الاختياري.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الإيقاف_الاختياري.md:8">
P2: `related_terms` now stores Markdown as `*p*-hacking`, but the glossary template neither renders that Markdown nor strips it before slugging. Store the plain term `p-hacking` so it displays and links correctly.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/شارات_العلوم_المفتوحة.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/شارات_العلوم_المفتوحة.md:3">
P2: This added page keeps `Badges (Open Science)` in the glossary, contrary to the requested removal. Remove the badge row/page from the source data and regenerate the glossary instead of adding this renamed page.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/المراجعات_المنهجي_ة_غير_الت_دخلي_ة_المفتوحة_والقابلة_للت_كرار.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/المراجعات_المنهجي_ة_غير_الت_دخلي_ة_المفتوحة_والقابلة_للت_كرار.md:13">
P3: This reference uses `et al.` as an in-text abbreviation. List the first 19 authors, an ellipsis, and the final author in the APA reference entry.</violation>
</file>
Note: This PR contains a large number of files. cubic selects up to 200 of the highest-priority eligible files for this review, so some files may not have been reviewed.
Requires human review: Auto-approval blocked because this review re-detected 5 unresolved issues already reported by Cubic.
View guided diff | Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic
| "Incentive structure", | ||
| "Journal Impact Factor", | ||
| "p-hacking" | ||
| "*p*-hacking" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: Keep the related term as the plain title p-hacking. The *p* markup is not rendered in related terms: the lookup slug becomes p__hacking, so the link to the English p-hacking page breaks and the literal asterisks are shown.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/الت_لاعب_بالن_ظام.md, line 10:
<comment>Keep the related term as the plain title `p-hacking`. The `*p*` markup is not rendered in related terms: the lookup slug becomes `p__hacking`, so the link to the English p-hacking page breaks and the literal asterisks are shown.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
"Incentive structure",
"Journal Impact Factor",
- "p-hacking"
+ "*p*-hacking"
],
"references": [
</file context>
| "*p*-hacking" | |
| "p-hacking" |
| "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. <i>Social Studies of Science</i>, <i>46</i>(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", | ||
| "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. <i>Publications</i>, <i>7</i>(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" | ||
| "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. <i>Publications</i>, <i>7</i>(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", | ||
| "Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., & Gérard-Marchant, P. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. <i>Nature</i>, <i>585</i>(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: The new Harris et al. (2020) reference looks truncated. The NumPy Nature paper has about 26 authors, and this entry stops at Gérard-Marchant without the remaining authors or the final author, Oliphant. Verify against the DOI record and use the APA 7 form for 21+ authors (first 19, ellipsis, final author). The same list is copied into apa_lookup.json and the other-language glossary files.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/الإسهام.md, line 16:
<comment>The new Harris et al. (2020) reference looks truncated. The NumPy Nature paper has about 26 authors, and this entry stops at Gérard-Marchant without the remaining authors or the final author, Oliphant. Verify against the DOI record and use the APA 7 form for 21+ authors (first 19, ellipsis, final author). The same list is copied into apa_lookup.json and the other-language glossary files.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,16 +3,17 @@
"Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. <i>Social Studies of Science</i>, <i>46</i>(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046",
- "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. <i>Publications</i>, <i>7</i>(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048"
+ "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. <i>Publications</i>, <i>7</i>(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048",
+ "Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., & Gérard-Marchant, P. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. <i>Nature</i>, <i>585</i>(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2"
],
"drafted_by": [
</file context>
| "title": "برنامج قوة جي [GPower]", | ||
| "sort_key": "برنامج قوة جي [gpower]", | ||
| "definition": "برنامج إحصائي مجاني لإجراء تحليلات القوة. يحدد المستخدم الاختبار الإحصائي المطلوب (مثل اختبار تي ، الانحدار، تحليل التباين (أنوفا))، وثلاثة مما يلي: عدد المجموعات/الملاحظات، أو حجم التأثير، أو مستوى الأهمية، أو القوة، من أجل حساب الجانب غير المحدد. **المصطلحات ذات الصِّلة:** تحليل القوة، تبرير حجم العينة، تخطيط حجم العينة، القوة الإحصائيَّة.", | ||
| "definition": "برنامج إحصائي مجاني لإجراء تحليلات القوة. يحدد المستخدم الاختبار الإحصائي المطلوب (مثل اختبار تي ، الانحدار، تحليل التباين (أنوفا))، وثلاثة مما يلي: عدد المجموعات/الملاحظات، أو حجم التأثير، أو مستوى الأهمية، أو القوة، من أجل حساب الجانب غير المحدد.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: Removing the inline Arabic related-terms line leaves the Arabic page with only the English related-term labels from related_terms. The translated Arabic names (تحليل القوة، تبرير حجم العينة، تخطيط حجم العينة، القوة الإحصائيَّة) are no longer shown anywhere. If the structured field is meant to replace this line, confirm that English labels on an Arabic page are acceptable. Otherwise, keep the Arabic terms, for example by adding them to the rendered output.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/برنامج_قوة_جي.md, line 6:
<comment>Removing the inline Arabic related-terms line leaves the Arabic page with only the English related-term labels from `related_terms`. The translated Arabic names (تحليل القوة، تبرير حجم العينة، تخطيط حجم العينة، القوة الإحصائيَّة) are no longer shown anywhere. If the structured field is meant to replace this line, confirm that English labels on an Arabic page are acceptable. Otherwise, keep the Arabic terms, for example by adding them to the rendered output.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"title": "برنامج قوة جي [GPower]",
"sort_key": "برنامج قوة جي [gpower]",
- "definition": "برنامج إحصائي مجاني لإجراء تحليلات القوة. يحدد المستخدم الاختبار الإحصائي المطلوب (مثل اختبار تي ، الانحدار، تحليل التباين (أنوفا))، وثلاثة مما يلي: عدد المجموعات/الملاحظات، أو حجم التأثير، أو مستوى الأهمية، أو القوة، من أجل حساب الجانب غير المحدد. **المصطلحات ذات الصِّلة:** تحليل القوة، تبرير حجم العينة، تخطيط حجم العينة، القوة الإحصائيَّة.",
+ "definition": "برنامج إحصائي مجاني لإجراء تحليلات القوة. يحدد المستخدم الاختبار الإحصائي المطلوب (مثل اختبار تي ، الانحدار، تحليل التباين (أنوفا))، وثلاثة مما يلي: عدد المجموعات/الملاحظات، أو حجم التأثير، أو مستوى الأهمية، أو القوة، من أجل حساب الجانب غير المحدد.",
"related_terms": [
"Power analysis",
</file context>
| "definition": "ممارسة تحليل البيانات بشكلٍ متكرِّر أثناء عمليَّة جمع البيانات، واتِّخاذ قرار بإيقاف جمع البيانات إذا وصل معيار إحصائي (مثل قيمة الاحتماليَّة، أو عامل بايز) إلى حدٍّ معيّن. وإذا تم اتِّخاذ الاحتياطات المنهجيَّة المناسبة للتَّحكُّم في معدَّل الخطأ من النُّوع الأوَّل، فقد يكون هذا إجراءً فعالًا (مثل Lakens ، 2014). ومع ذلك ، بدون الإبلاغ الشَّفاف، أو التَّحكُّم المناسب في الخطأ ، يمكن أن يزيد الخطأ من النُّوع الأوَّل بشكل كبير، ويمكن اعتبار التوقف الاختياري ممارسة بحث مشكوك فيها، أو شكلًا من أشكال قرصنة القيمة الاحتماليَّة.", | ||
| "related_terms": [ | ||
| "p-hacking", | ||
| "*p*-hacking", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: related_terms now stores Markdown as *p*-hacking, but the glossary template neither renders that Markdown nor strips it before slugging. Store the plain term p-hacking so it displays and links correctly.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/الإيقاف_الاختياري.md, line 8:
<comment>`related_terms` now stores Markdown as `*p*-hacking`, but the glossary template neither renders that Markdown nor strips it before slugging. Store the plain term `p-hacking` so it displays and links correctly.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
+ "definition": "ممارسة تحليل البيانات بشكلٍ متكرِّر أثناء عمليَّة جمع البيانات، واتِّخاذ قرار بإيقاف جمع البيانات إذا وصل معيار إحصائي (مثل قيمة الاحتماليَّة، أو عامل بايز) إلى حدٍّ معيّن. وإذا تم اتِّخاذ الاحتياطات المنهجيَّة المناسبة للتَّحكُّم في معدَّل الخطأ من النُّوع الأوَّل، فقد يكون هذا إجراءً فعالًا (مثل Lakens ، 2014). ومع ذلك ، بدون الإبلاغ الشَّفاف، أو التَّحكُّم المناسب في الخطأ ، يمكن أن يزيد الخطأ من النُّوع الأوَّل بشكل كبير، ويمكن اعتبار التوقف الاختياري ممارسة بحث مشكوك فيها، أو شكلًا من أشكال قرصنة القيمة الاحتماليَّة.",
"related_terms": [
- "p-hacking",
+ "*p*-hacking",
"Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)",
"Sequential testing"
</file context>
| "*p*-hacking", | |
| "p-hacking", |
| @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "type": "glossary", | |||
| "en_title": "Badges (Open Science)", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: This added page keeps Badges (Open Science) in the glossary, contrary to the requested removal. Remove the badge row/page from the source data and regenerate the glossary instead of adding this renamed page.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/شارات_العلوم_المفتوحة.md, line 3:
<comment>This added page keeps `Badges (Open Science)` in the glossary, contrary to the requested removal. Remove the badge row/page from the source data and regenerate the glossary instead of adding this renamed page.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+{
+ "type": "glossary",
+ "en_title": "Badges (Open Science)",
+ "title": "شارات العلوم المفتوحة [Badges (Open Science)]",
+ "sort_key": "شارات العلوم المفتوحة [badges (open science)]",
</file context>
| "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)", | ||
| "p-value", | ||
| "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" | ||
| "*p*-value", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: *p*-value is Markdown emphasis, but related terms are rendered as raw HTML link text, so the asterisks will show literally. Use the plain title p-value; it still resolves to the English p_value page.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/الد_لالة_الإحصائي_ة.md, line 12:
<comment>`*p*-value` is Markdown emphasis, but related terms are rendered as raw HTML link text, so the asterisks will show literally. Use the plain title `p-value`; it still resolves to the English `p_value` page.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,14 +3,14 @@
"Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)",
- "p-value",
- "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)"
+ "*p*-value",
+ "Type I error"
],
</file context>
| "*p*-value", | |
| "p-value", |
| ], | ||
| "references": [ | ||
| "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). <i>An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR)</i>. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" | ||
| "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., et al. (2021). <i>An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR)</i>. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: This reference uses et al. as an in-text abbreviation. List the first 19 authors, an ellipsis, and the final author in the APA reference entry.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/المراجعات_المنهجي_ة_غير_الت_دخلي_ة_المفتوحة_والقابلة_للت_كرار.md, line 13:
<comment>This reference uses `et al.` as an in-text abbreviation. List the first 19 authors, an ellipsis, and the final author in the APA reference entry.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
],
"references": [
- "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). <i>An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR)</i>. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z"
+ "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., et al. (2021). <i>An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR)</i>. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z"
],
"drafted_by": [
</file context>
| "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., et al. (2021). <i>An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR)</i>. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" | |
| "Topor, M. K., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F., Elsherif, M. M., Evans, T. R., Henderson, E. L., Kalandadze, T., Nitschke, F., Staaks, J. P. C., van den Akker, O. R., Yeung, S. K., Zaneva, M., Lam, A., Madan, C. R., Moreau, D., O’Mahony, A., Parker, A. J., . . . Westwood, S. J. (2021). <i>An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR)</i>. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 55 files (changes from recent commits).
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="content/glossary/english/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/english/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md:8">
P2: These newly split related terms still render without links: the glossary template strips `(COS)` and `(OERs)` before lookup, but the generated pages retain those suffixes in their slugs. Preserve the parenthesized suffixes or resolve related pages by title so both terms link correctly.</violation>
</file>
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
View guided diff | Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic
| @@ -5,13 +5,13 @@ | |||
| "sort_key": "open scholarship knowledge base", | |||
| "definition": "The Open Scholarship Knowledge Base (OSKB) is a collaborative initiative to share knowledge on the what, why and how of open scholarship to make this knowledge easy to find and apply. Information is curated and created by the community. The OSKB is a community under the Center for Open Science (COS).", | |||
| "related_terms": [ | |||
| "Center for Open Science (COS), Open Educational Resources (OERs)", | |||
| "Center for Open Science (COS)", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: These newly split related terms still render without links: the glossary template strips (COS) and (OERs) before lookup, but the generated pages retain those suffixes in their slugs. Preserve the parenthesized suffixes or resolve related pages by title so both terms link correctly.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/english/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md, line 8:
<comment>These newly split related terms still render without links: the glossary template strips `(COS)` and `(OERs)` before lookup, but the generated pages retain those suffixes in their slugs. Preserve the parenthesized suffixes or resolve related pages by title so both terms link correctly.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
"definition": "The Open Scholarship Knowledge Base (OSKB) is a collaborative initiative to share knowledge on the what, why and how of open scholarship to make this knowledge easy to find and apply. Information is curated and created by the community. The OSKB is a community under the Center for Open Science (COS).",
"related_terms": [
- "Center for Open Science (COS), Open Educational Resources (OERs)",
+ "Center for Open Science (COS)",
+ "Open Educational Resources (OERs)",
"Open scholarship",
</file context>
…to tools and sites
Regenerated from the Glossary sheet and the Glossary BibTeX Doc.
- Sources become author–year citations in every language, and their references are
listed: Academic Impact (ESRC), Consortium authorship (The BMJ; JMIR Publications),
Open Data (Open Knowledge Foundation), OER Commons, Open Source software (Open Source
Initiative) and Preregistration Pledge (Free Our Knowledge).
- Pointers stay as links with short visible text: orcid.org/register, protocols.io,
sortee.org, credit.niso.org, OpenNeuro (Chinese), and the zcurve package by its DOI
(doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.zcurve).
- DOI: the translations drop the DOI Handbook quotation that the English no longer has.
- BibTeX: group authors are braced so they no longer render as personal names
("Definition, T. O.", "Knowledge, F. O.", "Council, E. a. S. R."); the ESRC entry
points to UKRI's current "Defining impact" page, as the old address now redirects to
ESRC's homepage; the DOI Handbook is credited to the DOI Foundation with its URL.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 existing issue remains and 11 new issues found across 68 files (changes from recent commits).
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oer_commons.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oer_commons.md:6">
P3: The quote “collaborative teaching and learning” came from the /about page, but the citation now resolves to the site homepage. Add a reference entry for https://www.oercommons.org/about (or keep the about-page link) so the quoted wording stays traceable.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/turkish/akademik_etki.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/turkish/akademik_etki.md:6">
P3: The inline citation is glued to the end of the previous sentence: `edebilir.(krş.` needs a space before the opening parenthesis. The same typo was already in the file before this PR, but this line is being rewritten, so it should be fixed now.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/ت_عهد_الت_سجيل_المسبق.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/ت_عهد_الت_سجيل_المسبق.md:12">
P3: This `About` reference has no in-text citation in the Arabic definition, so it is an orphan entry. Cite it in the definition as `(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)`, matching the English page, or remove the reference.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/german/präregistrierungs_versprechen.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/german/präregistrierungs_versprechen.md:12">
P2: This About reference is never cited in the German definition, which only cites "(Free Our Knowledge, 2020)". The English source cites "(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)", so update the German in-text citation to match, or drop this reference.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/english/orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/english/orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md:6">
P3: Article error on this modified line: "A organisation" should be "An organisation". This file is generated from the Glossary sheet, so the fix belongs in the source sheet or it will be overwritten on the next regeneration.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/chinese/预注册承诺.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/chinese/预注册承诺.md:6">
P2: The in-text citation omits the 2020 Pledge source, so that reference is listed but never cited. Change the citation to “(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)” to match the English entry and the reference list.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/english/consortium_authorship.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/english/consortium_authorship.md:15">
P3: The new references are appended after the Tierney entries, which breaks the list's alphabetical order. Place "The BMJ" before "Open Science Collaboration" and "JMIR Publications" between "Open Science Collaboration" and "Tierney".</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/turkish/ön_kayıt_taahhüdü.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/turkish/ön_kayıt_taahhüdü.md:6">
P3: The Turkish definition cites only the undated About page, while its two-year pledge claim comes from the 2020 Preregistration Pledge reference listed below. Match the English entry by citing both `(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)`.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/english/preregistration_pledge.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/english/preregistration_pledge.md:6">
P3: `Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.` reverses APA’s order for same-author works. Use `Free Our Knowledge, n.d., 2020` and list the n.d. reference first.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/german/offene_daten.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/german/offene_daten.md:6">
P2: This URL-to-citation replacement drops the closing parenthesis for the German translation and leaves a stray quote before the citation. Close the `(dt. …)` phrase before `(Open Knowledge Foundation, n.d.)` and remove the stray quote.</violation>
</file>
<file name="content/glossary/arabic/الت_حالف_الت_أليفي.md">
<violation number="1" location="content/glossary/arabic/الت_حالف_الت_أليفي.md:16">
P2: The JMIR reference URL has an extra trailing hyphen after `ORCID`, so the glossary’s citation link does not match the article’s canonical URL. Remove the final hyphen.</violation>
</file>
Requires human review: Auto-approval blocked because this review re-detected 1 unresolved issue already reported by Cubic.
View guided diff | Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic
| "related_terms": [ | ||
| "Preregistration" | ||
| ], | ||
| "references": [ | ||
| "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). <i>Preregistration Pledge</i>. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" | ||
| "Free Our Knowledge. (2020). <i>Preregistration Pledge</i>. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/", | ||
| "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). <i>About</i>. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: This About reference is never cited in the German definition, which only cites "(Free Our Knowledge, 2020)". The English source cites "(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)", so update the German in-text citation to match, or drop this reference.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/german/präregistrierungs_versprechen.md, line 12:
<comment>This About reference is never cited in the German definition, which only cites "(Free Our Knowledge, 2020)". The English source cites "(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)", so update the German in-text citation to match, or drop this reference.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@
"references": [
- "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). <i>Preregistration Pledge</i>. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/"
+ "Free Our Knowledge. (2020). <i>Preregistration Pledge</i>. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/",
+ "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). <i>About</i>. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/"
],
"drafted_by": [
</file context>
| @@ -3,12 +3,13 @@ | |||
| "en_title": "Preregistration Pledge", | |||
| "title": "预注册承诺 [Preregistration Pledge]", | |||
| "sort_key": "yuzhucechengnuo", | |||
| "definition": "在一项“支持开放与可重复研究实践的集体行动”中,预注册承诺是“解放我们的知识”项目发起的一项倡议,旨在号召研究者在未来两年内至少预注册一项研究(https://freeourknowledge.org/about/)。该项目是由早期职业研究人员自发组织的基层学术运动。", | |||
| "definition": "在一项“支持开放与可重复研究实践的集体行动”中,预注册承诺是“解放我们的知识”项目发起的一项倡议,旨在号召研究者在未来两年内至少预注册一项研究(Free Our Knowledge, n.d.)。该项目是由早期职业研究人员自发组织的基层学术运动。", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: The in-text citation omits the 2020 Pledge source, so that reference is listed but never cited. Change the citation to “(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)” to match the English entry and the reference list.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/chinese/预注册承诺.md, line 6:
<comment>The in-text citation omits the 2020 Pledge source, so that reference is listed but never cited. Change the citation to “(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)” to match the English entry and the reference list.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@
"title": "预注册承诺 [Preregistration Pledge]",
"sort_key": "yuzhucechengnuo",
- "definition": "在一项“支持开放与可重复研究实践的集体行动”中,预注册承诺是“解放我们的知识”项目发起的一项倡议,旨在号召研究者在未来两年内至少预注册一项研究(https://freeourknowledge.org/about/)。该项目是由早期职业研究人员自发组织的基层学术运动。",
+ "definition": "在一项“支持开放与可重复研究实践的集体行动”中,预注册承诺是“解放我们的知识”项目发起的一项倡议,旨在号召研究者在未来两年内至少预注册一项研究(Free Our Knowledge, n.d.)。该项目是由早期职业研究人员自发组织的基层学术运动。",
"related_terms": [
"Preregistration"
</file context>
| "definition": "在一项“支持开放与可重复研究实践的集体行动”中,预注册承诺是“解放我们的知识”项目发起的一项倡议,旨在号召研究者在未来两年内至少预注册一项研究(Free Our Knowledge, n.d.)。该项目是由早期职业研究人员自发组织的基层学术运动。", | |
| "definition": "在一项“支持开放与可重复研究实践的集体行动”中,预注册承诺是“解放我们的知识”项目发起的一项倡议,旨在号召研究者在未来两年内至少预注册一项研究(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)。该项目是由早期职业研究人员自发组织的基层学术运动。", |
| @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ | |||
| "en_title": "Open Data", | |||
| "title": "Offene Daten [Open Data]", | |||
| "sort_key": "offene daten [open data]", | |||
| "definition": "Offene Daten sind frei verfügbare und direkt zugängliche Daten, die von anderen uneingeschränkt genutzt werden können. \"Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose” (dt. Offene Daten und Inhalte können von jeder:m zu jedem Zweck frei verwendet, verändert und weitergegeben werden\" ) ([https://opendefinition.org/](https://opendefinition.org/)). Offene Daten unterliegen sowohl dem Erfordernis der Kennzeichnung als auch des Teilens, daher ist es wichtig, geeignete Lizenzen (Open Licenses) in Betracht zu ziehen. Sensible oder zeitkritische Datensätze können mit einer Sperrfrist (embargo) belegt oder mit selektiveren Zugriffsoptionen freigegeben werden, um die Integrität der Daten zu gewährleisten.", | |||
| "definition": "Offene Daten sind frei verfügbare und direkt zugängliche Daten, die von anderen uneingeschränkt genutzt werden können. \"Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose” (dt. Offene Daten und Inhalte können von jeder:m zu jedem Zweck frei verwendet, verändert und weitergegeben werden\" (Open Knowledge Foundation, n.d.). Offene Daten unterliegen sowohl dem Erfordernis der Kennzeichnung als auch des Teilens, daher ist es wichtig, geeignete Lizenzen (Open Licenses) in Betracht zu ziehen. Sensible oder zeitkritische Datensätze können mit einer Sperrfrist (embargo) belegt oder mit selektiveren Zugriffsoptionen freigegeben werden, um die Integrität der Daten zu gewährleisten.", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: This URL-to-citation replacement drops the closing parenthesis for the German translation and leaves a stray quote before the citation. Close the (dt. …) phrase before (Open Knowledge Foundation, n.d.) and remove the stray quote.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/german/offene_daten.md, line 6:
<comment>This URL-to-citation replacement drops the closing parenthesis for the German translation and leaves a stray quote before the citation. Close the `(dt. …)` phrase before `(Open Knowledge Foundation, n.d.)` and remove the stray quote.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"title": "Offene Daten [Open Data]",
"sort_key": "offene daten [open data]",
- "definition": "Offene Daten sind frei verfügbare und direkt zugängliche Daten, die von anderen uneingeschränkt genutzt werden können. \"Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose” (dt. Offene Daten und Inhalte können von jeder:m zu jedem Zweck frei verwendet, verändert und weitergegeben werden\" ) ([https://opendefinition.org/](https://opendefinition.org/)). Offene Daten unterliegen sowohl dem Erfordernis der Kennzeichnung als auch des Teilens, daher ist es wichtig, geeignete Lizenzen (Open Licenses) in Betracht zu ziehen. Sensible oder zeitkritische Datensätze können mit einer Sperrfrist (embargo) belegt oder mit selektiveren Zugriffsoptionen freigegeben werden, um die Integrität der Daten zu gewährleisten.",
+ "definition": "Offene Daten sind frei verfügbare und direkt zugängliche Daten, die von anderen uneingeschränkt genutzt werden können. \"Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose” (dt. Offene Daten und Inhalte können von jeder:m zu jedem Zweck frei verwendet, verändert und weitergegeben werden\" (Open Knowledge Foundation, n.d.). Offene Daten unterliegen sowohl dem Erfordernis der Kennzeichnung als auch des Teilens, daher ist es wichtig, geeignete Lizenzen (Open Licenses) in Betracht zu ziehen. Sensible oder zeitkritische Datensätze können mit einer Sperrfrist (embargo) belegt oder mit selektiveren Zugriffsoptionen freigegeben werden, um die Integrität der Daten zu gewährleisten.",
"related_terms": [
"Badges (Open Science)",
</file context>
| "definition": "Offene Daten sind frei verfügbare und direkt zugängliche Daten, die von anderen uneingeschränkt genutzt werden können. \"Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose” (dt. Offene Daten und Inhalte können von jeder:m zu jedem Zweck frei verwendet, verändert und weitergegeben werden\" (Open Knowledge Foundation, n.d.). Offene Daten unterliegen sowohl dem Erfordernis der Kennzeichnung als auch des Teilens, daher ist es wichtig, geeignete Lizenzen (Open Licenses) in Betracht zu ziehen. Sensible oder zeitkritische Datensätze können mit einer Sperrfrist (embargo) belegt oder mit selektiveren Zugriffsoptionen freigegeben werden, um die Integrität der Daten zu gewährleisten.", | |
| "definition": "Offene Daten sind frei verfügbare und direkt zugängliche Daten, die von anderen uneingeschränkt genutzt werden können. \"Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose” (dt. Offene Daten und Inhalte können von jeder:m zu jedem Zweck frei verwendet, verändert und weitergegeben werden) (Open Knowledge Foundation, n.d.). Offene Daten unterliegen sowohl dem Erfordernis der Kennzeichnung als auch des Teilens, daher ist es wichtig, geeignete Lizenzen (Open Licenses) in Betracht zu ziehen. Sensible oder zeitkritische Datensätze können mit einer Sperrfrist (embargo) belegt oder mit selektiveren Zugriffsoptionen freigegeben werden, um die Integrität der Daten zu gewährleisten.", |
| "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., et al. (2020). Creative destruction in science. <i>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</i>, <i>161</i>, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", | ||
| "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., et al. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", | ||
| "The BMJ. (n.d.). <i>Authorship & contributorship</i>. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship", | ||
| "JMIR Publications. (2021). <i>What is a group author (collaborative author) and does it need an ORCID?</i> https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001449591-What-is-a-group-author-collaborative-author-and-does-it-need-an-ORCID-" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: The JMIR reference URL has an extra trailing hyphen after ORCID, so the glossary’s citation link does not match the article’s canonical URL. Remove the final hyphen.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/الت_حالف_الت_أليفي.md, line 16:
<comment>The JMIR reference URL has an extra trailing hyphen after `ORCID`, so the glossary’s citation link does not match the article’s canonical URL. Remove the final hyphen.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,15 +3,17 @@
- "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., et al. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060"
+ "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., et al. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060",
+ "The BMJ. (n.d.). <i>Authorship & contributorship</i>. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship",
+ "JMIR Publications. (2021). <i>What is a group author (collaborative author) and does it need an ORCID?</i> https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001449591-What-is-a-group-author-collaborative-author-and-does-it-need-an-ORCID-"
],
"drafted_by": [
</file context>
| @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ | |||
| "en_title": "Open Educational Resources (OER) Commons", | |||
| "title": "Open Educational Resources (OER) Commons", | |||
| "sort_key": "open educational resources (oer) commons", | |||
| "definition": "OER Commons (with OER standing for open educational resources) is a freely accessible online library allowing teachers to create, share and remix educational resources. The goal of the OER movement is to stimulate “collaborative teaching and learning” ([https://www.oercommons.org/about](https://www.oercommons.org/about)) and provide high-quality educational resources that are accessible for everyone.", | |||
| "definition": "OER Commons (with OER standing for open educational resources) is a freely accessible online library allowing teachers to create, share and remix educational resources. The goal of the OER movement is to stimulate “collaborative teaching and learning” (OER Commons, n.d.) and provide high-quality educational resources that are accessible for everyone.", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: The quote “collaborative teaching and learning” came from the /about page, but the citation now resolves to the site homepage. Add a reference entry for https://www.oercommons.org/about (or keep the about-page link) so the quoted wording stays traceable.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oer_commons.md, line 6:
<comment>The quote “collaborative teaching and learning” came from the /about page, but the citation now resolves to the site homepage. Add a reference entry for https://www.oercommons.org/about (or keep the about-page link) so the quoted wording stays traceable.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"title": "Open Educational Resources (OER) Commons",
"sort_key": "open educational resources (oer) commons",
- "definition": "OER Commons (with OER standing for open educational resources) is a freely accessible online library allowing teachers to create, share and remix educational resources. The goal of the OER movement is to stimulate “collaborative teaching and learning” ([https://www.oercommons.org/about](https://www.oercommons.org/about)) and provide high-quality educational resources that are accessible for everyone.",
+ "definition": "OER Commons (with OER standing for open educational resources) is a freely accessible online library allowing teachers to create, share and remix educational resources. The goal of the OER movement is to stimulate “collaborative teaching and learning” (OER Commons, n.d.) and provide high-quality educational resources that are accessible for everyone.",
"related_terms": [
"Equity",
</file context>
| "references": [ | ||
| "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). <i>Preregistration Pledge</i>. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" | ||
| "Free Our Knowledge. (2020). <i>Preregistration Pledge</i>. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/", | ||
| "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). <i>About</i>. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: This About reference has no in-text citation in the Arabic definition, so it is an orphan entry. Cite it in the definition as (Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.), matching the English page, or remove the reference.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/arabic/ت_عهد_الت_سجيل_المسبق.md, line 12:
<comment>This `About` reference has no in-text citation in the Arabic definition, so it is an orphan entry. Cite it in the definition as `(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)`, matching the English page, or remove the reference.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@
"references": [
- "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). <i>Preregistration Pledge</i>. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/"
+ "Free Our Knowledge. (2020). <i>Preregistration Pledge</i>. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/",
+ "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). <i>About</i>. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/"
],
"drafted_by": [
</file context>
| @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ | |||
| "en_title": "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)", | |||
| "title": "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)", | |||
| "sort_key": "orcid (open researcher and contributor id)", | |||
| "definition": "A organisation that provides a registry of persistent unique identifiers (ORCID iDs) for researchers and scholars, allowing these users to link their digital research documents and other contributions to their ORCID record. This avoids the name ambiguity problem in scholarly communication. ORCID iDs provide unique, persistent identifiers connecting researchers and their scholarly work. It is free to register for an ORCID iD at https://orcid.org/register.", | |||
| "definition": "A organisation that provides a registry of persistent unique identifiers (ORCID iDs) for researchers and scholars, allowing these users to link their digital research documents and other contributions to their ORCID record. This avoids the name ambiguity problem in scholarly communication. ORCID iDs provide unique, persistent identifiers connecting researchers and their scholarly work. It is free to register for an ORCID iD at [orcid.org/register](https://orcid.org/register).", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: Article error on this modified line: "A organisation" should be "An organisation". This file is generated from the Glossary sheet, so the fix belongs in the source sheet or it will be overwritten on the next regeneration.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/english/orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md, line 6:
<comment>Article error on this modified line: "A organisation" should be "An organisation". This file is generated from the Glossary sheet, so the fix belongs in the source sheet or it will be overwritten on the next regeneration.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"title": "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)",
"sort_key": "orcid (open researcher and contributor id)",
- "definition": "A organisation that provides a registry of persistent unique identifiers (ORCID iDs) for researchers and scholars, allowing these users to link their digital research documents and other contributions to their ORCID record. This avoids the name ambiguity problem in scholarly communication. ORCID iDs provide unique, persistent identifiers connecting researchers and their scholarly work. It is free to register for an ORCID iD at https://orcid.org/register.",
+ "definition": "A organisation that provides a registry of persistent unique identifiers (ORCID iDs) for researchers and scholars, allowing these users to link their digital research documents and other contributions to their ORCID record. This avoids the name ambiguity problem in scholarly communication. ORCID iDs provide unique, persistent identifiers connecting researchers and their scholarly work. It is free to register for an ORCID iD at [orcid.org/register](https://orcid.org/register).",
"related_terms": [
"Authorship",
</file context>
| "definition": "A organisation that provides a registry of persistent unique identifiers (ORCID iDs) for researchers and scholars, allowing these users to link their digital research documents and other contributions to their ORCID record. This avoids the name ambiguity problem in scholarly communication. ORCID iDs provide unique, persistent identifiers connecting researchers and their scholarly work. It is free to register for an ORCID iD at [orcid.org/register](https://orcid.org/register).", | |
| "definition": "An organisation that provides a registry of persistent unique identifiers (ORCID iDs) for researchers and scholars, allowing these users to link their digital research documents and other contributions to their ORCID record. This avoids the name ambiguity problem in scholarly communication. ORCID iDs provide unique, persistent identifiers connecting researchers and their scholarly work. It is free to register for an ORCID iD at [orcid.org/register](https://orcid.org/register).", |
| "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" | ||
| "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., et al. (2020). Creative destruction in science. <i>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</i>, <i>161</i>, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", | ||
| "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., et al. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", | ||
| "The BMJ. (n.d.). <i>Authorship & contributorship</i>. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: The new references are appended after the Tierney entries, which breaks the list's alphabetical order. Place "The BMJ" before "Open Science Collaboration" and "JMIR Publications" between "Open Science Collaboration" and "Tierney".
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/english/consortium_authorship.md, line 15:
<comment>The new references are appended after the Tierney entries, which breaks the list's alphabetical order. Place "The BMJ" before "Open Science Collaboration" and "JMIR Publications" between "Open Science Collaboration" and "Tierney".</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,15 +3,17 @@
"Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., et al. (2020). Creative destruction in science. <i>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</i>, <i>161</i>, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002",
- "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., et al. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060"
+ "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., et al. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. <i>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</i>, <i>93</i>, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060",
+ "The BMJ. (n.d.). <i>Authorship & contributorship</i>. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship",
+ "JMIR Publications. (2021). <i>What is a group author (collaborative author) and does it need an ORCID?</i> https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001449591-What-is-a-group-author-collaborative-author-and-does-it-need-an-ORCID-"
],
</file context>
| @@ -3,12 +3,13 @@ | |||
| "en_title": "Preregistration Pledge", | |||
| "title": "Ön-kayıt Taahhüdü [Preregistration Pledge]", | |||
| "sort_key": "ozn-kayizt taahhuzduz [preregistration pledge]", | |||
| "definition": "‘Açık ve yeniden üretilebilir araştırma uygulamalarını destekleyen kolektif bir eylem’ kapsamında, araştırmacılardan önümüzdeki iki yıl içinde en az bir çalışmayı ön kayıt altına alacaklarına dair söz vermelerini isteyen ön-kayıt taahhüdü, Free Our Knowledge projesi ile başlatılmış bir girişimdir ([https://freeourknowledge.org/about/](https://freeourknowledge.org/about/)). Proje, erken kariyer araştırmacıları (EKA) tarafından başlatılmış tabandan gelen bir harekettir.", | |||
| "definition": "‘Açık ve yeniden üretilebilir araştırma uygulamalarını destekleyen kolektif bir eylem’ kapsamında, araştırmacılardan önümüzdeki iki yıl içinde en az bir çalışmayı ön kayıt altına alacaklarına dair söz vermelerini isteyen ön-kayıt taahhüdü, Free Our Knowledge projesi ile başlatılmış bir girişimdir (Free Our Knowledge, n.d.). Proje, erken kariyer araştırmacıları (EKA) tarafından başlatılmış tabandan gelen bir harekettir.", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: The Turkish definition cites only the undated About page, while its two-year pledge claim comes from the 2020 Preregistration Pledge reference listed below. Match the English entry by citing both (Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.).
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/turkish/ön_kayıt_taahhüdü.md, line 6:
<comment>The Turkish definition cites only the undated About page, while its two-year pledge claim comes from the 2020 Preregistration Pledge reference listed below. Match the English entry by citing both `(Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.)`.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@
"title": "Ön-kayıt Taahhüdü [Preregistration Pledge]",
"sort_key": "ozn-kayizt taahhuzduz [preregistration pledge]",
- "definition": "‘Açık ve yeniden üretilebilir araştırma uygulamalarını destekleyen kolektif bir eylem’ kapsamında, araştırmacılardan önümüzdeki iki yıl içinde en az bir çalışmayı ön kayıt altına alacaklarına dair söz vermelerini isteyen ön-kayıt taahhüdü, Free Our Knowledge projesi ile başlatılmış bir girişimdir ([https://freeourknowledge.org/about/](https://freeourknowledge.org/about/)). Proje, erken kariyer araştırmacıları (EKA) tarafından başlatılmış tabandan gelen bir harekettir.",
+ "definition": "‘Açık ve yeniden üretilebilir araştırma uygulamalarını destekleyen kolektif bir eylem’ kapsamında, araştırmacılardan önümüzdeki iki yıl içinde en az bir çalışmayı ön kayıt altına alacaklarına dair söz vermelerini isteyen ön-kayıt taahhüdü, Free Our Knowledge projesi ile başlatılmış bir girişimdir (Free Our Knowledge, n.d.). Proje, erken kariyer araştırmacıları (EKA) tarafından başlatılmış tabandan gelen bir harekettir.",
"related_terms": [
"Preregistration"
</file context>
| "definition": "‘Açık ve yeniden üretilebilir araştırma uygulamalarını destekleyen kolektif bir eylem’ kapsamında, araştırmacılardan önümüzdeki iki yıl içinde en az bir çalışmayı ön kayıt altına alacaklarına dair söz vermelerini isteyen ön-kayıt taahhüdü, Free Our Knowledge projesi ile başlatılmış bir girişimdir (Free Our Knowledge, n.d.). Proje, erken kariyer araştırmacıları (EKA) tarafından başlatılmış tabandan gelen bir harekettir.", | |
| "definition": "‘Açık ve yeniden üretilebilir araştırma uygulamalarını destekleyen kolektif bir eylem’ kapsamında, araştırmacılardan önümüzdeki iki yıl içinde en az bir çalışmayı ön kayıt altına alacaklarına dair söz vermelerini isteyen ön-kayıt taahhüdü, Free Our Knowledge projesi ile başlatılmış bir girişimdir (Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.). Proje, erken kariyer araştırmacıları (EKA) tarafından başlatılmış tabandan gelen bir harekettir.", |
| @@ -3,12 +3,13 @@ | |||
| "en_title": "Preregistration Pledge", | |||
| "title": "Preregistration Pledge", | |||
| "sort_key": "preregistration pledge", | |||
| "definition": "In a “collective action in support of open and reproducible research practices'', the preregistration pledge is a campaign from the Project Free Our Knowledge that asks a researcher to commit to preregistering at least one study in the next two years ([https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/](https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/) [https://freeourknowledge.org/about/](https://freeourknowledge.org/about/)). The project is a grassroots movement initiated by early career researchers (ECRs).", | |||
| "definition": "In a “collective action in support of open and reproducible research practices'', the preregistration pledge is a campaign from the Project Free Our Knowledge that asks a researcher to commit to preregistering at least one study in the next two years (Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.). The project is a grassroots movement initiated by early career researchers (ECRs).", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d. reverses APA’s order for same-author works. Use Free Our Knowledge, n.d., 2020 and list the n.d. reference first.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. When an issue isn't valid or won't be fixed in this PR, reply in its thread with the reason and then resolve the thread. At content/glossary/english/preregistration_pledge.md, line 6:
<comment>`Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.` reverses APA’s order for same-author works. Use `Free Our Knowledge, n.d., 2020` and list the n.d. reference first.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@
"title": "Preregistration Pledge",
"sort_key": "preregistration pledge",
- "definition": "In a “collective action in support of open and reproducible research practices'', the preregistration pledge is a campaign from the Project Free Our Knowledge that asks a researcher to commit to preregistering at least one study in the next two years ([https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/](https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/) [https://freeourknowledge.org/about/](https://freeourknowledge.org/about/)). The project is a grassroots movement initiated by early career researchers (ECRs).",
+ "definition": "In a “collective action in support of open and reproducible research practices'', the preregistration pledge is a campaign from the Project Free Our Knowledge that asks a researcher to commit to preregistering at least one study in the next two years (Free Our Knowledge, 2020, n.d.). The project is a grassroots movement initiated by early career researchers (ECRs).",
"related_terms": [
"Preregistration"
</file context>
[HOLD] Don't merge before #1111. Like #1092, this restores the italic p in related terms, which needs #1111's rendering on
main.Glossary regeneration from the Glossary sheet (12 November). It replaces #1092: it carries all of #1092's changes, plus the Arabic fixes below, which the Arabic glossary team asked for after reviewing the Doors preview. All were made in the sheet; every changed cell is logged with its old value.
Arabic fixes (new in this run)
_renamed_terms.jsonlists every old address as an alias, and each was live on forrt.org before this run. The German aliases from [HOLD] 📘 Glossary update - 2026-11-09 (replaces #1084) #1092 (ba618d2) are carried in the same commit.New in this run (all made in the sheet or the BibTeX Doc) (from #1092)
Lariviere2016BibTeX entry and Crossref (10.1177/0306312716650046).*p*-hacking,*p*-value,*p*-value fishingandReverse *p*-hackingare back in tenRelated_termscells. Doors renders and links them (Render Markdown in glossary term titles and related terms #1085). Until Doors is live, forrt.org shows the asterisks and these related terms are not linked.ALLEA2017entry in the BibTeX Doc: Revised Edition, Berlin, ISBN 978-3-00-055767-5). The definition quotes wording from the 2017 code that the 2023 revision changed, e.g. "consider negative results to be as valid as positive findings" became "can be as relevant as". Authorship still cites the 2023 edition.Carried over from #1084 (from #1092)
_renamed_terms.jsonplus the regenerated aliases). It applied without conflicts. Both files now match 📘 Glossary update - 2026-11-09 #1084.Added on 11 November (review fixes, made in the sheet or the BibTeX Doc) (from #1092)
www.zenodo.org) sources whose APA reference already gives that link. Syed (2019) now has its DOI, and DataCite Schema and Closed access have APA references.Checks
content/glossary/arabic/, the glossary content matches [HOLD] 📘 Glossary update - 2026-11-09 (replaces #1084) #1092's branch except forlastmoddates.**, an "NA" credit or a bare "Ruwayshid".🤖 Generated with Claude Code