Remove the Named residual's dangling reference (0.13.1) - #29
Conversation
The Named residual in CLAUDE.md §5 and in /dev-workflow:workflow-init's template ended with "as the standing sentences above require". That list exists only in the loop-rule target text (§F), not above the paragraph in either installed prompt, so the clause pointed nowhere. It is removed from both copies; the sentence before it states the rule on its own. No rule changed. dev-workflow 0.13.0 -> 0.13.1. Gate B: one pass, full (spec + quality), both branches NO FINDINGS; closed on the zero-finding exit. No story cited, so no evidence entry is owed. cycle al2i9s67y7; floor 3 per none; hook reminder threshold absent cycle al2i9s67y7; Gate B (passes 1, codex): Findings 0. Blockers 0. Majors 0. Human exceptions: none
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe Named residual statement is revised in ChangesNamed residual wording
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The release removes a dangling reference from both prompt copies without changing the rule. The changelog and version match; no material merge risk remains. Architecture SummaryArchitecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The change affects 2 systems. Changed systems: Architecture concerns Review detailsSystems and components
Before / after behavior
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. A rabbit reads the words anew Comment |
|
The Named residual in CLAUDE.md §5 and in /dev-workflow:workflow-init's template ended with
"as the standing sentences above require". That list exists only in the loop-rule target text
(§F), not above the paragraph in either installed prompt, so the clause pointed nowhere. It is
removed from both copies; the sentence before it states the rule on its own. No rule changed.
dev-workflow 0.13.0 -> 0.13.1.
Gate B: one pass, full (spec + quality), both branches NO FINDINGS; closed on the zero-finding
exit. No story cited, so no evidence entry is owed.
cycle al2i9s67y7; floor 3 per none; hook reminder threshold absent
cycle al2i9s67y7; Gate B (passes 1, codex): Findings 0. Blockers 0. Majors 0.
Human exceptions: none
Summary by CodeRabbit