Skip to content

fix(deps): update dependency express-rate-limit to v8.7.2 - #577

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/express-rate-limit-8.x
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/express-rate-limit-8.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Nov 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
express-rate-limit 8.7.1 → 8.7.2 age confidence

Release Notes

express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit (express-rate-limit)

v8.7.2

Compare Source

You can view the changelog here.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Berlin)

  • Branch creation
    • Between 08:00 AM and 11:59 AM, only on Tuesday (* 8-11 * * 2)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file renovate labels Nov 3, 2026
@bito-code-review

bito-code-review Bot commented Nov 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Skipped - Label Excluded

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the PR contains excluded label: renovate.
No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. To trigger a review manually, type /review in a comment and save.

You can change this by removing the label from Filters → Exclude Labels setting here, or from the labels_excluded field in the .bito.yaml file (if repo-level configurations are enabled), or contact your workspace admin at michael.pearce@contentful.com.

@bito-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Skipped - Label Excluded

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the PR contains excluded label: renovate.
No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. To trigger a review manually, type /review in a comment and save.

You can change this by removing the label from Filters → Exclude Labels setting here, or from the labels_excluded field in the .bito.yaml file (if repo-level configurations are enabled), or contact your workspace admin at michael.pearce@contentful.com.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/express-rate-limit-8.x branch from a4c9cd3 to 48a1c6a Compare November 4, 2026 08:50
@bito-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Skipped - Label Excluded

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the PR contains excluded label: renovate.
No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. To trigger a review manually, type /review in a comment and save.

You can change this by removing the label from Filters → Exclude Labels setting here, or from the labels_excluded field in the .bito.yaml file (if repo-level configurations are enabled), or contact your workspace admin at michael.pearce@contentful.com.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/express-rate-limit-8.x branch from 48a1c6a to 4903cad Compare November 4, 2026 10:43
@bito-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Skipped - Label Excluded

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the PR contains excluded label: renovate.
No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. To trigger a review manually, type /review in a comment and save.

You can change this by removing the label from Filters → Exclude Labels setting here, or from the labels_excluded field in the .bito.yaml file (if repo-level configurations are enabled), or contact your workspace admin at michael.pearce@contentful.com.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file renovate wizexclude

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants