Skip to content

add requirements tracking with duvet - #2

Open
victornicolet wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
victornicolet/tracking-with-duvet
Open

add requirements tracking with duvet#2
victornicolet wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
victornicolet/tracking-with-duvet

Conversation

@victornicolet

@victornicolet victornicolet commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This adds requirements tracking with duvet following up on @john-h-kastner-aws suggestion in #1.
The requirements are RFC 8259.

Splitting the requirements and assigning them to some code blocks can feel a little arbitrary when dealing with the low level properties (esp. tokenizer), but at least the high-level requirements are easier to track.

In particular, the coverage will fail since we don't prove the high-level requirement for completeness.

This PR doesn't change the functionality in any meaningful way. Some constants have been renamed to match the spec names, and a new module has been added to track some conformance facts explicitly in the code.

Signed-off-by: Victor Nicolet <victornl@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Nicolet <victornl@amazon.com>
@victornicolet

victornicolet commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The RFC coverage check will fail until we have proven "completeness" for the parser.

Signed-off-by: Victor Nicolet <victornl@amazon.com>
@victornicolet
victornicolet force-pushed the victornicolet/tracking-with-duvet branch from 8060a4d to 4e0162d Compare August 20, 2026 19:46
Signed-off-by: Victor Nicolet <victornl@amazon.com>
@victornicolet
victornicolet force-pushed the victornicolet/tracking-with-duvet branch from 3eda681 to 05e5603 Compare August 24, 2026 16:55
Comment thread .duvet/snapshot.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
SPECIFICATION: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8259

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a generated file but I think it's worth keeping in git. We may want to see when tracking information changes (specs or implementation).

@victornicolet
victornicolet marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2026 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant