Repository navigation
fix(cli): preserve attachments across successive edits - #9226
Open
bradseiler wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
bradseiler wants to merge 5 commits into
bradseiler wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
Carry the latest live replacement metadata and provide explicit clearing. Order successive edits after their observed head and fail on incomplete history. Co-authored-by: Honor <e0bf479eeebe47dde1e35705212a4df70616a7bc834d907ddfb18cf0405f8b1b@seiler-test.communities.public.builderlabstaging.xyz> Signed-off-by: Brad Seiler <seiler@squareup.com>
Resolve live originals and the latest edit in a primary snapshot. Require a versioned response so older relays cannot silently provide incomplete attachment state. Co-authored-by: Honor <e0bf479eeebe47dde1e35705212a4df70616a7bc834d907ddfb18cf0405f8b1b@seiler-test.communities.public.builderlabstaging.xyz> Signed-off-by: Brad Seiler <seiler@squareup.com>
Recognize partition child indexes, box large CLI and ingest futures, and verify fresh reader authorization through HTTP. Include both journeys in the media acceptance recipe. Co-authored-by: Honor <e0bf479eeebe47dde1e35705212a4df70616a7bc834d907ddfb18cf0405f8b1b@seiler-test.communities.public.builderlabstaging.xyz> Signed-off-by: Brad Seiler <seiler@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Honor <e0bf479eeebe47dde1e35705212a4df70616a7bc834d907ddfb18cf0405f8b1b@seiler-test.communities.public.builderlabstaging.xyz> Signed-off-by: Brad Seiler <seiler@squareup.com>
bradseiler
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 7, 2026 00:00
🔐 Codex Security Review
Review SummaryOverall Risk: NONE
FindingsNo concrete security, correctness, or reliability findings were identified. Notes
Generated by Codex Security Review | |
wpfleger96
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2026
wpfleger96
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 Approving. I checked the parts that carry the risk:
- Read authorization on the new
effective_editlookup. It runs after relay-member admission and the existing/querygates. Its SQL rule (channel not deleted, andvisibility='open'or an activechannel_membersrow) matches whatget_readable_named_only_channelsgrants a filter that names the channel. It then appliesevent_visible_to_readerto both the original and the edit, so a reader gets nothing here that the normal explicit-channel read wouldn't give them. Missing and inaccessible both return the same 404. - Edit selection. The latest-edit SQL doesn't filter by pubkey. That's fine because
validate_edit_ownershiponly accepts 40003s from the effective author or the owning human, so every stored live edit already comes from an authorized editor. Carried files are still publication-checked per signer. - CLI. It refuses to publish unless it gets the exact v1 envelope back, so a new CLI against an old relay fails closed. It re-checks the returned original's id, kind and channel. Stamping
max(now, head+1)with a 60s ceiling stays well inside the relay's 900s future bound. - SDK. Rejecting non-
imetatags inbuild_edit_with_mediacloses off injecting a target, channel or auth tag.
Nonblocking:
- The PostgreSQL and E2E lanes were still running when I looked, and the description mentions two Postgres fixture fixes that haven't been pushed yet. Once they land, the Testing paragraph's in-progress status can come out.
buzz-relaynow has a dev-dependency onbuzz-clijust for the CLI end-to-end test. That's reasonable, but it does grow the relay's test build graph.
Share the attachment-governed kind set across the CLI, lookup and media reads. Preserve attachments through edits and keep explicit clear effective for diff and forum messages. Add isolated access journeys and a historical exposure preflight. Co-authored-by: Honor <e0bf479eeebe47dde1e35705212a4df70616a7bc834d907ddfb18cf0405f8b1b@seiler-test.communities.public.builderlabstaging.xyz> Signed-off-by: Brad Seiler <seiler@squareup.com>
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Editing attachment messages through
buzz messages editcan remove their files from the effective message. Preserve the latest live imeta set across successive edits and add--clear-attachmentsfor explicit removal. Add an SDK builder for complete replacement attachment sets while preserving the existing API.The relay provides a versioned effective-edit lookup on
/query. It uses the existing normalized-target index, fresh channel authorization, and a primary snapshot. Generic#ematching is unchanged. Mixed-case historical edits cannot restore removed files, including when another reference would allow republication.Related issue
Fixes #3022. Follows #9077. Related open attempts: #3062 and #3065.
Testing
No manual testing. Automated coverage invokes the real CLI entrypoint against local HTTP/ingest/media handlers in enforce mode. It checks successive edits, GET/HEAD, explicit and partial removal, and the mixed-case target witness. A database regression seeds 10,001 unrelated edits and checks the target index plan.
Draft validation is still in progress. The expanded local PostgreSQL run currently has two test-fixture failures: a parent-versus-child index name assertion and a test-thread stack overflow. Corrections are prepared. All 3,030 non-ignored SDK/CLI/DB/relay tests passed at
e8b1cf0527. Mandatory push hooks are running; Tauri clippy has passed. Independent review is in progress.Rollout
Deploy the relay first, then release the CLI. The new CLI aborts without publishing if an older relay ignores the lookup extension. Old clients keep their previous behavior against the new relay. This change has no feature flag and needs no new schema beyond migration 0086.
Enforce remains blocked for the separate
block/buzz-appMCP edit producer and unaudited direct SDK publishers. The compatibilitybuild_edithelper still removes attachments; integrations must adoptbuild_edit_with_mediaand effective state. Agent ownership grants no private-channel media access. A retaining edit is rejected if any carried file is not publishable by its signer.Observe
buzz_media_publication_access_total{mode="shadow",reason="denied"}before enforcement. Roll back the CLI release while retaining the additive lookup. Concurrent message edits remain ordered by(created_at,id); the lookup adds no compare-and-swap precondition.Generated with Codex