-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
fix: support Utf8/LargeUtf8/Utf8View in native RLike without panicking #5215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sam-1112
wants to merge
4
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
sam-1112:fix-rlike-string-layouts-5102
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+168
−35
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
24e5a4e
fix: support Utf8/LargeUtf8/Utf8View in native RLike without panickin…
sam-1112 00f6ca0
style: cargo fmt
sam-1112 4874f48
fix: handle any dictionary key type in RLike and tighten review follo…
sam-1112 c799e5b
test: cover nulls in RLike dictionary values and drop stray doc comment
sam-1112 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Optional and non-blocking
This follows on from the comment by @andygrove below about
is_nullable()Since
is_nullable()islogical_null_count() != 0, the else branch only runs on an array with no nulls, andStringArrayTypegives usiter().BooleanArrayimplementsFromIterator<Option<bool>>, so both branches collapse into:The uncovered branch stops existing rather than needing a test, and null handling no longer depends on
is_nullable().process_parse_urlinurl_funcs/parse_url.rsalready uses the sameStringArrayTypebound and the same iter/collect shape.Worth noting
ArrayIter's docs call interleaved null-mask handling suboptimal, but relative toRegex::is_matchI would expect that to be noiseref: https://docs.rs/arrow/latest/arrow/array/struct.ArrayIter.html
Also,
&'a selfties the borrow ofselfto the input lifetime and nothing is borrowed out of it, so plain&selfwould doThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good suggestion — I've collapsed
is_matchto theiter/map/collectform (and switched to&self), matchingprocess_parse_url. That removes theis_nullable()branch entirely, so the uncovered else path no longer exists.