| Version | Security updates |
|---|---|
| 1.x | Supported |
0.x and rollup-plugin-polyfill-node releases |
Not maintained by this project |
The historical unscoped package is controlled by its own maintainers. This project cannot issue, withdraw, or patch releases under that name.
Do not open a public issue for a suspected vulnerability. Use the repository's private security-advisory form:
https://github.com/alexandroit/stackline-rollup-plugin-polyfill-node/security/advisories/new
Include:
- the affected package version and integrity or tarball hash;
- the Rollup and Node.js versions used to reproduce it;
- whether the problem occurs while building, in the generated browser bundle, or in release tooling;
- a minimal input and configuration;
- impact, prerequisites, and any known workaround; and
- whether disclosure is already public or subject to a deadline.
Do not include credentials, production data, or an exploit against systems you do not own. Maintainers aim to acknowledge a complete report within three business days and provide an initial assessment within seven business days. These are response goals, not a guarantee of resolution time.
In scope are vulnerabilities in:
- plugin resolution, loading, or transform behavior;
- generated browser polyfills and injected globals;
- package exports, install scripts, and packed-artifact contents;
- deterministic build, provenance, license, or SBOM controls where bypass can change released code; and
- the exact installed production dependency closure.
A documented absence of Node server semantics in a browser is not by itself a
security vulnerability. fs and default crypto are intentionally rejected;
other unsupported modules have the resolver behavior documented in the
support matrix. A report is in scope if the plugin
silently permits or misrepresents an import contrary to that matrix. The
legacy crypto: true empty-module opt-in provides no cryptographic security.
The vm polyfill is a compatibility helper, not a sandbox or security
boundary. Never execute untrusted code with it.
Maintainers will coordinate validation, affected ranges, credit, embargo, and release timing with the reporter. A security release must pass the same source, packed-consumer, production-closure, CodeQL, reproducibility, license, and SBOM gates as any other release. Public disclosure should follow availability of a tested fix whenever coordinated disclosure permits.