Skip to content

fix(eth/downloader): don't mistake a lagging head for a stalling peer - #2515

Merged
gzliudan merged 1 commit into
XinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:fix-processHeaders
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

fix(eth/downloader): don't mistake a lagging head for a stalling peer#2515
gzliudan merged 1 commit into
XinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:fix-processHeaders

Conversation

@gzliudan

@gzliudan gzliudan commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Proposed changes

Importing the post-pivot blocks moves the header head back to the block being inserted, so CurrentHeader can trail the headers the peer already delivered. When processHeaders reached the terminating batch inside that window, the fast sync TD check saw a head below the promised total difficulty and returned errStallingPeer, which rolled the whole chain back and dropped the only peer. This is what made TestFastSyncDisabling flaky under load: once the peer was dropped, BestPeer stayed nil and the sync loop could never recover.

processHeaders now tracks the highest header written to the light chain in this cycle (lastInserted) and uses it when it is ahead of CurrentHeader. Attack detection is unchanged: a peer that bails out of delivering the post-pivot headers never advances it, so TestHighTDStarvationAttack* still returns errStallingPeer.

The stalling-peer checks are also guarded against a missing local TD: GetTd returns nil when the TD is absent from the database (legacy XDPoS chaindata), which td.Cmp(nil) would turn into a panic. Both checks now skip the comparison and report the occurrence via a new eth/downloader/headers/missingtd counter metric, warning once per downloader lifetime.

Compatibility: no consensus, protocol, or database schema changes; this is a sync-logic fix only and needs no migration or operator coordination.

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
  • chore: Changes that don't change source code or tests
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • revert: Revert something
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Impacted Components

Which parts of the codebase does this PR touch?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Tested on a private network from the genesis block and monitored the chain operating correctly for multiple epochs.
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 80e3107b-d705-482e-95f4-3169c1b5970c

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Fixes false errStallingPeer detection during fast sync when block imports temporarily move the current header backward.

Changes:

  • Tracks the highest successfully inserted header for the current sync cycle.
  • Uses that header for the terminating TD check when CurrentHeader lags.
  • Adds regression tests across supported protocol versions.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
eth/downloader/downloader.go Corrects the fast/light sync stalling-peer check.
eth/downloader/downloader_test.go Simulates header-head lag and verifies successful fast sync.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-processHeaders branch from 6d0fc63 to 860f906 Compare August 11, 2026 09:08
Comment thread eth/downloader/downloader.go
@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-processHeaders branch from 860f906 to 5f581b5 Compare August 14, 2026 16:38
@gzliudan
gzliudan requested a review from wgr523 August 14, 2026 16:39
@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-processHeaders branch from 5f581b5 to 9d7f977 Compare August 14, 2026 16:48
@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-processHeaders branch from 9d7f977 to 4a663db Compare August 14, 2026 22:36
@gzliudan gzliudan changed the title fix(eth/downloader): don't mistake a lagging header head for a stalling peer fix(eth/downloader): don't mistake a lagging head for a stalling peer Aug 14, 2026
@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-processHeaders branch 4 times, most recently from e18d48a to 4141121 Compare August 14, 2026 23:14
@gzliudan
gzliudan requested a balanced review from Copilot August 15, 2026 00:01

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Suppressed comments (1)

eth/downloader/downloader_test.go:1159

  • This test cannot reliably prove that its own two sync cycles increment the counter while it runs in parallel: increments from the other eight cases can satisfy delta >= 2 even if this case never records an occurrence. Run these metric-delta tests serially (or use an instance-local hook/counter) so regressions are not masked.
	t.Parallel()

Comment thread eth/downloader/downloader.go Outdated
Comment thread eth/downloader/downloader.go Outdated
@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-processHeaders branch from 4141121 to b5d376f Compare August 15, 2026 01:08
Importing the post-pivot blocks moves the header head back to the block
being inserted, so CurrentHeader can trail the headers the peer already
delivered. When processHeaders reached the terminating batch inside that
window, the fast sync TD check saw a head below the promised total
difficulty and returned errStallingPeer, which rolled the whole chain
back and dropped the only peer.

Track the highest header written to the light chain in this cycle and
use it when it is ahead of CurrentHeader. Attack detection is unchanged:
a peer that bails out of delivering the post-pivot headers never
advances it.

This is what made TestFastSyncDisabling flaky under load: once the peer
was dropped, BestPeer stayed nil and the sync loop could never recover.
@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-processHeaders branch from b5d376f to 4d18e40 Compare August 15, 2026 21:43
@gzliudan
gzliudan merged commit f13dc61 into XinFinOrg:dev-upgrade Aug 15, 2026
14 checks passed
@gzliudan
gzliudan deleted the fix-processHeaders branch August 15, 2026 22:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants