Skip to content

docs(state): point Current focus at Phase 04, not the completed Phase 03 - #4

Merged
hermanngeorge15 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/state-current-focus-phase-04
Oct 21, 2026
Merged

hermanngeorge15 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/state-current-focus-phase-04

Conversation

@hermanngeorge15

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

One stale line in .planning/STATE.md. Its body claimed Phase 03 was the current focus while its own frontmatter and Current Position block both said Phase 4:

stopped_at: Phase 4 context gathered      <- frontmatter
**Current focus:** Phase 03 — ...          <- line 24, stale
Phase: 4 / Status: Ready to execute        <- line 27

ROADMAP.md records Phase 3 as Complete (2026-07-12).

Deliberately not changed

total_phases: 4, completed_phases: 1 and percent: 25 are correct. Milestone v1.1 contains exactly four phases (3, 4, 5 and 6) and Phase 3 is the one complete — the counters scope to the milestone, not to the project's six total phases. They looked wrong at a glance, which is why this note exists.

Verified

Baseline green at this commit: 76 passed, 0 failed, 1 ignored, 3s.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

STATE.md's body said "Current focus: Phase 03 — api-hardening-toolchain-spikes"
while its own frontmatter said `stopped_at: Phase 4 context gathered` and the
Current Position block three lines below said "Phase: 4 / Ready to execute".
ROADMAP.md records Phase 3 as Complete (2026-07-12).

Only that one line was stale. `total_phases: 4`, `completed_phases: 1` and
`percent: 25` are correct and deliberately untouched: milestone v1.1 contains
exactly four phases (3-6) and Phase 3 is the one complete.

Baseline verified green at this commit: 76 passed, 0 failed, 1 ignored.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@hermanngeorge15
hermanngeorge15 merged commit 907161c into main Oct 21, 2026
1 check passed
@hermanngeorge15
hermanngeorge15 deleted the docs/state-current-focus-phase-04 branch October 21, 2026 09:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant