Document Protocol Theta recursive-feedback provenance - #137
Draft
Steake wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
c, (\Phi), global-accessibility, surprise, stability and suspension measurementsWhy
The repository contains September 2025 implementations and recorded trajectories that predate arXiv:2608.11348v1, but the surviving evidence has material gaps. This change preserves the useful historical result without laundering uncertainty: complete prior-output reinjection is strongly established, while historical execution of the paper's exact raw-output-as-sole-input protocol is not.
The work is framed around GödelOS's original programme of bounded recursive cognition, self-models, continuity and falsifiable consciousness-correlate hypotheses. It makes no allegation of copying or derivation and does not claim that recursive feedback demonstrates phenomenal consciousness.
Impact
Researchers can now inspect the precise provenance boundary, rerun three explicitly separated protocols, and reproduce the modern lexical analysis without confusing it with historical metrics. Historical artefacts remain in Git history rather than being silently restored or modernised at HEAD.
Validation
python -m py_compile experiments/recursive-feedback/*.pypython -m unittest discover -s experiments/recursive-feedback -p 'test_*.py' -v— 5 passedgit diff --checkpassedKnown provenance limits