Skip to content

add support for ArborX point localization backend #245

Description

@jacobmerson

We did some initial benchmarking with the ArborX search routines in 2022 and found that the performance compared to the built-in uniform grid search was largely dependent on the structure of the mesh.

Examples of using triangle primitives with ArborX here: https://github.com/SCOREC/testTriArborX

Note: PCMS search primitives are now provide an understanding of the topology that a point is localized onto (i.e., we return the point, edge, face), not just if a point is "inside" an element. This will require some additional handling beyond what ArborX natively proviedes. See: #214

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions