Skip to content

Regenerate for ledger policy per entity - #297

Merged
jfrench9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/regen-ledger-policy-keeper
Nov 15, 2026
Merged

jfrench9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/regen-ledger-policy-keeper

Conversation

@jfrench9

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Regenerated against robosystems main plus RoboFinSystems/robosystems#2055. Generated tier only: no facade or checked-in operation changes.

The new field arrives in robosystems v1.23.0; against an older server it is absent and parses as its default.

Testing

just test-all: 750 passed, lint, format and typecheck clean.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@jfrench9
jfrench9 merged commit 96abe2a into main Nov 15, 2026
6 checks passed
@jfrench9
jfrench9 deleted the chore/regen-ledger-policy-keeper branch November 15, 2026 02:30
jfrench9 added a commit to RoboFinSystems/robosystems-typescript-client that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2026
## Summary

Regenerated against robosystems `main` plus
RoboFinSystems/robosystems#2055. Generated tier
only (`sdk/`): no facade or GraphQL document changes. The twin of
RoboFinSystems/robosystems-python-client#297.

- **`ConnectionResponse.keeps_books`** (new): whether the connection is
the ledger of record for its `entity_id`. `write_policy` and `entity_id`
descriptions updated for the per-entity model (robosystems
RoboFinSystems/robosystems#2053).
- **`CreateEntityRequest.reporting_style_id`** and
**`changeReportingStyle`**: a consolidation entity always takes, and
follows, the group parent's Style (robosystems
RoboFinSystems/robosystems#2052).
- **Description drift swept up by the regen**: six member, invitation
and API-key operations note that they require a signed-in session and do
not accept API keys.

The new field arrives in robosystems **v1.23.0**; against an older
server it is simply absent (it is optional in the type).

## Testing

`npm run test:all`: 516 tests passed; format, lint and typecheck clean.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant