Skip to content

docs: improve in-container resource control wording - #710

Open
Creativeklvn wants to merge 2 commits into
Project-HAMi:masterfrom
Creativeklvn:architecture-components
Open

docs: improve in-container resource control wording#710
Creativeklvn wants to merge 2 commits into
Project-HAMi:masterfrom
Creativeklvn:architecture-components

Conversation

@Creativeklvn

@Creativeklvn Creativeklvn commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

This PR improves the wording of the in-container resource control documentation.

Changes

  • Changed “In container resource control” to “in-container resource control” for grammatical clarity.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified architecture terminology by standardizing “In-container” wording and resource-control component capitalization across current and versioned documentation.

issue: #711

@hami-robot

hami-robot Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Creativeklvn
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign wawa0210 for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for project-hami ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fdae348
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/project-hami/deploys/6a70c5ca88a62900086dc75f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-710--project-hami.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes Run an agent on this branch

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@hami-robot hami-robot Bot added the size/XS label Aug 3, 2026
@hami-robot

hami-robot Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Welcome @Creativeklvn! It looks like this is your first PR to Project-HAMi/website 🎉

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 87416f5b-bf33-47c5-93eb-c1375318218f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 496a720 and fdae348.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/core-concepts/architecture.md
  • versioned_docs/version-v2.9.0/core-concepts/architecture.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/core-concepts/architecture.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The architecture documentation standardizes capitalization and hyphenation for in-container resource-control terminology in the current and versioned documentation.

Changes

Architecture documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Standardize resource-control terminology
docs/core-concepts/architecture.md, versioned_docs/version-v2.9.0/core-concepts/architecture.md
Updates component labels and HAMi-Core descriptions to use “In-container” and “in-container” terminology.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related issues

  • Project-HAMi/website issue 711: Requests the same terminology correction in the architecture documentation.

Suggested labels: kind/documentation

Suggested reviewers: rootsongjc

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the documentation wording change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Signed-off-by: Kelvin Uneze <kelvinuneze@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kelvin Uneze <kelvinuneze@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/docs dco-signoff: yes kind/documentation Improvements or additions to documentation size/XS

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant