docs: cite the Zenodo preprint DOI in paper.md - #203
Merged
Conversation
The preprint reporting the synthetic and real-data leakage experiments is published on Zenodo as 10.5281/zenodo.22665386. JOSS's submitting.html asks for "publications, preprints, or documented use" and adds that aspirational statements about future use are not sufficient, so the Research impact statement now cites the preprint next to the replication archive it already cited. MetaArXiv rejected the same manuscript as out of scope for that series on 2026-09-08 and minted no DOI, so the Zenodo record is the only citable version. Part of #127.
17 tasks
The Research impact statement claimed "eleven merged pull requests from four contributors external to the project". Measured from the merged-PR list on 2026-09-08, the real figures are thirty-five merged pull requests from eleven contributors external to the project, excluding Dependabot and the maintainer. All thirty-five merged into main. Understating community contribution by three times in the section JOSS reads for it is worth correcting in the same PR that already edits this paragraph. Word count is unchanged at 1,597 against the 1,750 ceiling; the replacement is the same number of words.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The preprint reporting the synthetic and real-data leakage experiments is published on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22665386 (recid 22665386, concept 10.5281/zenodo.22665385, CC-BY-4.0, resource type Publication/Preprint). Its related identifiers cite the software DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22050896and the replication archive10.5281/zenodo.22050649, and mark it a supplement to this repository, so the paper and the preprint point at each other.JOSS's
submitting.htmlasks for "publications, preprints, or documented use" and adds that aspirational statements about future use are not sufficient.paper.md's Research impact statement now cites the preprint alongside the replication archive it already cited, andpaper.bibgains the matchingleakagepreprint2026entry.Context: MetaArXiv rejected the same manuscript on 2026-09-08 as "Outside of the scope of this preprint series" and minted no DOI, so the Zenodo record is the only citable version. Nothing anywhere should cite
10.31222/osf.io/qay8j; it does not exist.paper.mdword count is 1,597 against the 1,750 ceiling.Added after review: the same paragraph claimed "eleven merged pull requests from four contributors external to the project". Measured from the merged-PR list, the real figures are thirty-five merged pull requests from eleven contributors external to the project (40 external PRs from 12 accounts, minus Dependabot's 5; all 35 merged into
main). Understating community contribution three-fold in the section JOSS reads for exactly that is worth correcting here rather than in a separate PR, and the replacement is the same number of words, so the count stays at 1,597.Note
plan.md's "33 merged PRs from 10 external humans" is now stale for the same reason; it predates #194 and #202.This does not close #116. The 35-from-11 figure is accurate as of the merge date and will go stale again before 2026-10-26; there are five weeks of merges and an active good-first-issue funnel between now and then. The submission-day re-measurement of this sentence stays required: #116 stays open, and
plan.md's two unchecked submission-day items for it stay unchecked. This PR only stops a three-fold understatement from sitting in the paper for seven weeks; it does not replace the submission-day pass.