AIPerf stage 10: qualify all TRTMC video-language question-answering models #1677

Request type

New capability

Problem and use case

The inspected legacy vision-language contract accepts one image. Independent image calls do not establish temporal video understanding, and synthetic video inputs are distinct from video generation.

Proposed outcome

Qualify all supported models in this group for one video-language understanding workload through the existing native serving entrypoint.

• Workload: One fixed short clip plus a temporal question produces an answer.
• Client / endpoint: AIPerf chat; POST /v1/chat/completions with video content.
• Rollout / prerequisites: Model-group rollout after stage 9. An already-supported native temporal-input capability is required; adding one is outside this epic.

Existing-model scope — owner clarification

This epic integrates AIPerf with models and model specs already supported on upstream main. “Whole group” means every existing model/spec for this workload, rather than adding checkpoints that an architecture might also support.

• Reuse existing checkpoint identities, normal full-model profiles/manifests, build settings, references and correctness thresholds. Do not add model families, checkpoints, model specs/manifests, precision/parallel variants or new numerical gates to enlarge the group.
• HTTP/media adapters, AIPerf input/workload configuration and regression fixes needed for existing models are in scope. Keep model semantics family-owned and existing correctness criteria unchanged.
• Missing full-model implementations or native audio/video capabilities are recorded as unsupported/outside this integration. Do not implement a new encoder, model graph, temporal path or native Task to fill the inventory. L0/partial profiles do not require full-model onboarding in this epic.
• Refresh against current main only to include independently existing supported specs. Architectural compatibility, model cards and upstream model availability do not establish an in-scope TRTMC model.

Group-wide scope and completion (revised)

Cover every TRTMC-supported checkpoint in this model group for the workload below, not just one pilot. Refresh the inventory against github/main at implementation and before completion. Use family-owned manifests, actual build/runtime behavior, and public Task capabilities together; a model name, broad support declaration, or an inherited C++ interface alone does not establish the checkpoint's supported workload.

Use one normal full-model profile per distinct checkpoint and workload. Record all additional precision/quantization/TP/CP variants separately; do not count variants as extra models or claim untested configurations. L0/partial/random/regression smoke profiles do not establish full-model coverage. Checkpoints with only partial implementation remain explicit gaps, not silent omissions. Only independently existing supported specs on main join the refreshed inventory; do not add models or specs as part of this integration.

• Publish the exhaustive per-checkpoint inventory with checkpoint/profile/revision, native Task, supported controls, and any explicit capability gap; reconcile it with current main before closing.
• Every supported checkpoint passes its unchanged owning-family correctness criteria on the exact served bundle, followed by a real published pip-installed AIPerf run through trtmc-server for this one workload.
• Check meaningful complete output contents and native/HTTP identity for every model, with separately marked warmup, failures, client/Task timing, and workload-appropriate throughput.
• Publish a result row and reproducible command for every checkpoint. A pilot, source-only check, HTTP fixture, skipped test, unrun model, unsupported adapter, or unresolved failure cannot close this group-wide task.
• Preserve family ownership and existing quality criteria; fix real defects without introducing model behavior in shared serving code or relaxing gates.

Implementation scope:

1. Audit existing specs and real native clip-plus-question capabilities. Reuse an already-supported model/spec if one exists; otherwise report the stage as blocked by absent existing capability. Do not add models, specs or native Task contracts.
2. Preserve the existing family-owned temporal sampling, position semantics and orchestration. Add only transport/media adaptation to an existing capability; do not implement temporal model behavior in this epic.
3. Qualify real short clips with questions that require temporal information before expanding to MMVU or synthetic-video datasets.

Acceptance criteria for every model in the group:

• The issue records the chosen model, profile, checkpoint, precision, and actual temporal-input capability without claiming unsupported models are already available.
• Native answers satisfy family-owned correctness/quality criteria on temporal questions, using actual clip/multiple-frame inputs.
• A real pip-installed AIPerf run completes through native video-content chat, recording frame count, resolution, duration, sampling policy, request identity, failures, and separate client/Task timing.
• Reuse existing serving/qualification mechanics; keep all model semantics, orchestration, and correctness family-owned, with capability-based Task dispatch.
• Account for inputs, outputs/artifacts, failures, and warmup by request identity. Keep client end-to-end latency separate from public_task_call_wall; exclude build/load/startup/warmup from steady-state timing.
• Record tested package versions, checkpoint/profile, actual bundle, dataset, endpoint/mode, hardware, effective precision, settings, commands, and public evidence. Distinguish planned, implemented, family-validated, and AIPerf-qualified status.
• Provide one concise reproducible example using published pip-installed AIPerf and links to existing build guidance; an AIPerf source checkout is not a runtime dependency.

Model and target details

Inventory baseline: TRTMC fd79ad26ca71a11b3ec086a7daaaead03e6c933f. Candidate models/profiles for this group:

No existing full-model temporal-video-question-answering profile was found in this baseline. Audit all native vision-language/video-conditioned families for an actual clip-plus-temporal-question -> answer contract. A model card, multiple independent image calls, video generation or video segmentation does not qualify temporal QA. If no existing supported spec provides this behavior, keep a visible unsupported/blocked status and report the gap. Implementing a video-QA model, adding a spec or extending temporal model capability requires separate owner-authorized work.

Use the public native Task runtime path. Record the actual supported target GPU and software stack during implementation/qualification; no new hardware validation or benchmark is claimed by this planning issue. Keep existing numerical criteria unchanged.

Alternatives considered

Reuse apps/perf_serving protocol/media/recording mechanics and apps/aiperf_qual qualification instead of adding a third server or benchmark harness. Deliver this stage on its own short-lived branch from current github/main.

Follow-ups outside this initial stage: MMVU, generated synthetic input clips, longer clips, and additional sampling policies are separate experiments.

Additional context

• Parent epic: Epic: expand TRTMC AIPerf model and workload coverage #1667
• AIPerf docs/tutorials/synthetic-video.md
• Native server
• Existing qualification harness

Research baseline: TRTMC 0bccb5e93af0e5ad346aaf44e404396f54b2e7de and AIPerf e1daadd10faa395100384358131d784d6858c5ae; published AIPerf 0.13.0. Recheck the tested published version and native capabilities when implementing. Existing source/fixtures/reference-only runs do not establish end-to-end TRTMC qualification. Keep internal logs, artifacts, and runner details private.

Submission checks

• I searched open and closed issues and found no duplicate request.
• I removed secrets, private/internal evidence, personal paths, and restricted artifacts.

Group completion policy revised at the owner's request: all supported checkpoints in this group must be accounted for and qualified; one successful pilot is insufficient. Existing pilot results are retained as historical evidence.