Skip to content

ci(stale): increase stale workflow processing budget - #2979

Merged
elezar merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/stale-workflow-budget-clean
Aug 27, 2026
Merged

ci(stale): increase stale workflow processing budget#2979
elezar merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/stale-workflow-budget-clean

Conversation

@elezar

@elezar elezar commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Increase the stale workflow processing budget and split stale handling into separate issue and pull-request jobs. This keeps issue cleanup from competing with PR cleanup and gives the action enough operations to remove state:stale after human activity.

Related Issue

No issue required: localized CI workflow maintenance from triage-duty recommendation R-05.

Changes

  • Split the stale workflow into stale-issues and stale-pull-requests jobs.
  • Set operations-per-run: 300 for each job.
  • Sort stale processing by updated so recently active stale items are handled early.

Testing

  • mise run pre-commit passes
  • Unit tests added/updated
  • E2E tests added/updated (if applicable)

Could not run mise run pre-commit locally because mise is not available on PATH in this Codex environment. Ran git diff --check -- .github/workflows/stale.yml and Ruby YAML parsing successfully.

Checklist

  • Follows Conventional Commits
  • Commits are signed off (DCO)

Signed-off-by: Evan Lezar <elezar@nvidia.com>
@elezar
elezar requested review from a team, derekwaynecarr, mrunalp and sjenning as code owners August 27, 2026 08:12
@elezar
elezar enabled auto-merge August 27, 2026 12:06
@elezar
elezar added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 27, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5544715 Aug 27, 2026
39 checks passed
@elezar
elezar deleted the codex/stale-workflow-budget-clean branch August 27, 2026 12:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants