You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a few questions @dpo, is this the formulation you had in mind last week ? Do we apply this procedure only on nonlinear inequality constraints or to box constraints as well ? For my solver, I'd need to apply it to both but i am not sure whether this is a good thing to do in general.
Activity
dpo commentedon Mar 12, 2026
@MaxenceGollier The squared slacks transformation is useful in theory (for example, to derive the augmented Lagrangian method for inequality constraints or the second-order stationarity conditions for problems with inequality constraints), but in practice, it has serious disadvantages: https://publications.polymtl.ca/4755/1/2012_Armand_Squared_slacks_transformation_nonlinear_programming.pdf
MaxenceGollier commentedon Mar 16, 2026
@dpo, I am confused, you suggested a few weeks ago for me to use this approach to allow my equality-constraint solver to handle inequalities ?
dpo commentedon Mar 16, 2026
I said it would be an easy way to perform quick tests on inequality-constrained problems, but I don't think it's a viable long-term approach.
MaxenceGollier commentedon Mar 19, 2026
Ha, ok, closing this then.