[JarryShaw]

• Searched for similar pull requests
• Followed the coding style (make pylint, make mypy, make isort)
• make test passes, and a test case covers the change
• Added a changelog entry — N/A — centralised in docs(changelog): shared 1.5.0 changelog — long-lived, merges last (#610, #616, #617, #618, #620) #657

What is the purpose of your pull request?

• ci — changes to CI configuration files and scripts

---

Description of your pull request and other information

The next part of #2030. Lint's and Pages' runs that have no pull request now post to the CI reports Discussions category.

• lint.yml: scheduled and dispatched runs post every run to lint: weekly lint report. Pull-request runs never post.
  • Status: the job's result if that isn't success; otherwise warning when an advisory tool (bandit, mypy, vermin, pylint) failed, else success.
  • Steps: each tool step gains an id:, and its summary block is also teed into the report. Write the run report and Upload the run report close the job and are continue-on-error, so the check's result is unchanged.
• deploy-pages.yml: push and scheduled runs post to deploy-pages: documentation build report. The if: takes the same shape as Vendor's, so pull requests and verdicts for another commit don't post. The status comes from the gate, build and publish results.
• Both: a new discussion job alone holds discussions: write.
• Not in this PR:
  • CodeQL, Experimental and Compat each need a ruling, posted on ci: deliver scheduled-run reports somewhere that notifies #2030.
  • create-release.yml is the release workflow.
  • project-status.yml is the board sync.
  • cron-head.yml is a reusable gate.
• Tests: the new tests/project/test_lint_pages_reports_2030.py fails on main's two workflows and passes here. Three existing pins accept the new shape: test_actionlint_in_lint_1967, test_workflow_hardening_1968 and test_workflow_loader_1967_unit. These plus the new file: 54 passed. actionlint 1.7.12 exits 0, and the PR merges cleanly with build!: require Python 3.8+ and drop the BPC conversion (#2051) #2053.

[JarryShaw]

GOOD TO GO at 6db758f4b (Sonnet cross-review), with two prose fixes being folded in.

• Lint check unchanged on pull requests: each tool step still exits with its own captured status after the new tee, as a simulated set +e … | tee … ; exit "$status" shows. The report steps are continue-on-error and skip on pull_request. The job name is still Lint, which ruleset 23497679 requires.
• discussion jobs: only these hold discussions: write, and neither runs on a pull request. deploy-pages stays silent for a verdict on another commit. A successful push run is silent unless the last marker was bad.
• Tests: the new file fails on main's workflows (45 failed) and passes here. It and the pin files give 65 passed, and shellcheck is clean on every run: block. The three edited pins still guard what they did.

Being fixed: a counted "three jobs" in a deploy-pages.yml comment, and lint.yml's stale note that Lint is not a required check.

[JarryShaw]

GOOD TO GO at f99d7e98c (Sonnet delta re-review).

• No logic change: the delta changes comments only. I checked this myself by parsing both workflows at both heads: lint.yml and deploy-pages.yml are semantically identical, so nothing changes except comments.
• Wording fixed: the counted "three jobs" is gone.
• Lint documented as required: the lint.yml comment and the paragraph in workflows.rst now say Lint is required. The table's new Lint row matches the live ruleset 23497679.
• Tests: 64 passed.

[github-actions]

Coverage: 91.54% (unit tier, Python 3.15, f99d7e98c, Unit Tests run success)

Package	Statements	Missed	Branches	Partial	Cover
pcapkit (top level)	104	4	20	2	95.16%
pcapkit/const	19599	881	2618	867	92.11%
pcapkit/corekit	2567	71	816	37	96.57%
pcapkit/dumpkit	282	3	102	3	98.44%
pcapkit/foundation	2930	23	1022	25	98.79%
pcapkit/interface	138	4	52	3	96.32%
pcapkit/protocols	17436	219	4582	185	98.15%
pcapkit/toolkit	872	36	298	10	95.21%
pcapkit/utilities	529	7	160	5	98.26%
pcapkit/vendor	4431	1995	1018	167	51.73%

Per-file detail: the coverage-html artifact of this run.

[JarryShaw]

Ordering check on f99d7e98c: the project leg (util/run_unittest_leg.py project) ran 1920 tests, OK (71 skipped). CI: 61 checks green, 0 failing, Lint included. KTLO 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 legs: 0 failing tests. Ready to merge.