cleanup: move provisionStart into placement - #123
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Sarthak <sarthakshreshtha345@gmail.com>
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughProvisioning time now resides with region and capacity tier in an optional placement. Provisioning, readiness observation, teardown, and tests use this placement. Paths without placement handle it as nil. ChangesPlacement-Scoped Provision Timing
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Change: Refactor Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to No actionable issue remains before merge; normal checks still apply. Security Architecture ReviewSecurity architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The lifecycle change appears to preserve existing placement checks and cleanup behavior. No new security issue was established, though external retry guarantees remain unverified. Retained concerns Security review detailsSecurity Blast Radius
Trust Boundaries and Controls
Resilience and Maintainability Implications
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
/kind cleanup |
|
/assign Thanks @Sarthak-Shreshtha01 will take a look later. |
|
/lgtm |
InftyAI-Agent
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved: PR has both lgtm and approved labels
What this PR does / why we need it
Moves
provisionStartinto theplacementstruct, so the provisioning start time sits with the other placement data.Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Fixes #79
Special notes for your reviewer
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Summary by CodeRabbit