Skip to content

feat(data/smartphone): licensed Commons photos for 9 current flagships - #256

Merged
Seungpyo1007 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
data/top15-commons-images
Sep 25, 2026
Merged

Seungpyo1007 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
data/top15-commons-images

Conversation

@Seungpyo1007

@Seungpyo1007 Seungpyo1007 commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

TechPicks' top-15 canonical phones still had no photo after the automated Commons backfill (its gate only looks at each Wikipedia article's lead image, which is often a PNG render for recent flagships). These 9 were picked by hand from Wikimedia Commons by exact model title:

Record License File
galaxy-s24-ultra CC-BY-SA-4.0 Galaxy_S24_Ultra.jpg
galaxy-s25-ultra CC-BY-SA-4.0 Samsung_Galaxy_S25_Ultra_2025.jpg
galaxy-s26-ultra CC-BY-4.0 Galaxy_S26_Ultra_lavender.jpg
iphone-17-pro-max CC0-1.0 Silver_iPhone_17_Pro_Max.jpg
iphone-17-pro CC-BY-SA-4.0 IPhone_17_Pro_(cropped).jpg
iphone-air CC0-1.0 Space_Black_iPhone_Air.jpg
oneplus-15 CC-BY-SA-4.0 OnePlus_15_back.jpg
xiaomi-17 CC-BY-SA-4.0 Xiaomi_17_backside_Snow_Mountain_Pink.jpg
oppo-find-x9-ultra CC-BY-SA-4.0 OPPO_Find_X9_Ultra.jpg

Not added:

  • vivo-x300-ultra: the only Commons file is a low-res CC0 "hero shot" that looks like re-uploaded marketing material, so the license can't be trusted.
  • vivo X300s, realme GT 8 Pro, iQOO 13, Pixel 10 Pro XL: no photo on Commons.
  • galaxy-s26: every "Galaxy S26" hit is actually the S26 Ultra.

Closes #1

…ships

Galaxy S24/S25/S26 Ultra, iPhone 17 Pro/Pro Max/Air, OnePlus 15, Xiaomi 17,
OPPO Find X9 Ultra. Each file was picked by exact model title on Wikimedia
Commons, is a JPEG photo, and carries a free license (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA)
recorded in image_license with the uploader in image_attribution.

Refs #1
@TechEngineBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🔎 Data verification — Tier 0 (offline existence/trust)

Scored by app.verify; posted by TechEngineBot. Informational only — the structural gate (app.validate) is separate and authoritative for merge.

Changed records in this PR

120 record(s) scored.

%%{init: {"theme":"base","themeVariables":{"pie1":"#3fb950","pie2":"#d29922","pie3":"#f85149","pieStrokeWidth":"0px","pieOpacity":"1"}}}%%
pie showData
    title Verification bands — all records
    "Green" : 113
    "Yellow" : 7
    "Red" : 0
Loading
Category Distribution Total 🟢 🟡 🔴 🟢 %
brand 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 13 7 6 0 53.8%
smartphone 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 12 12 0 0 100.0%
tablet 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨 5 4 1 0 80.0%
watch 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 4 4 0 0 100.0%
pda 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 1 1 0 0 100.0%
cpu 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 85 85 0 0 100.0%
All 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨 120 113 7 0 94.2%

Full-dataset baseline

105858 record(s) scored.

%%{init: {"theme":"base","themeVariables":{"pie1":"#3fb950","pie2":"#d29922","pie3":"#f85149","pieStrokeWidth":"0px","pieOpacity":"1"}}}%%
pie showData
    title Verification bands — all records
    "Green" : 23636
    "Yellow" : 81126
    "Red" : 1096
Loading
Category Distribution Total 🟢 🟡 🔴 🟢 %
brand 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 207 122 85 0 58.9%
soc 🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 2077 231 824 1022 11.1%
smartphone 🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 93396 17912 75416 68 19.2%
tablet 🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 3455 288 3166 1 8.3%
watch 🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 433 43 386 4 9.9%
pda 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 140 83 57 0 59.3%
gpu 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 2030 1211 819 0 59.7%
cpu 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟥 4120 3746 373 1 90.9%
All 🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 105858 23636 81126 1096 22.3%

Hard violations (forced red):

Count Check
1 !boost_ge_base

green = authoritative source + complete + consistent · yellow = plausible, needs confirmation · red = sparse/weak source or a hard contradiction. Promotion to verified runs in the scheduled verify-network workflow.

@TechEngineBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TechEngine change review: PASS

Check Result
python -m app.validate PASS
New hard integrity anomalies vs PR base PASS

Changed data

Category Added Modified Deleted Added verified Added unverified Added Kaggle-sourced
brand 0 0 0 0 0 0
soc 0 0 0 0 0 0
smartphone 0 9 0 0 0 0
tablet 0 0 0 0 0 0
watch 0 0 0 0 0 0
pda 0 0 0 0 0 0
gpu 0 0 0 0 0 0
cpu 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changed record examples

smartphone modified

  • smartphone/apple/2025/iphone-17-pro-max.json - iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • smartphone/apple/2025/iphone-17-pro.json - iPhone 17 Pro
  • smartphone/apple/2025/iphone-air.json - iPhone Air
  • smartphone/oneplus/2025/oneplus-15.json - OnePlus 15
  • smartphone/oppo/2026/oppo-find-x9-ultra.json - Oppo Find X9 Ultra
  • smartphone/samsung/2024/galaxy-s24-ultra.json - Galaxy S24 Ultra
  • smartphone/samsung/2025/galaxy-s25-ultra.json - Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • smartphone/samsung/2026/galaxy-s26-ultra.json - Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • smartphone/xiaomi/2025/xiaomi-17.json - Xiaomi 17

Heuristic review

  • Heuristic warnings: none found.

@TechEngineBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TechEngine validation stats: PASS

Data summary

Category Total Verified Unverified Missing verified Tracked Verified % of tracked
brand 207 122 85 0 207 58.9%
soc 2077 193 1884 0 2077 9.3%
smartphone 93396 17501 75895 0 93396 18.7%
tablet 3455 273 3182 0 3455 7.9%
watch 433 39 394 0 433 9.0%
pda 140 74 66 0 140 52.9%
gpu 2030 1028 1002 0 2030 50.6%
cpu 4120 2869 1251 0 4120 69.6%
all 105858 22099 83759 0 105858 20.9%

Warning

Tracked verified coverage is below 50% for tablet 7.9% (273/3455), watch 9.0% (39/433), soc 9.3% (193/2077), smartphone 18.7% (17501/93396), all 20.9% (22099/105858).
Tracked coverage excludes records missing the verified field; see the Missing verified column for those records.
This does not fail validation. Keep imported records verified: false until manual audit, but treat this as follow-up verification work before relying on the affected categories as curated data.

Validation notes

  • The integrity gate blocks only hard anomalies introduced by this PR relative to its merge base.
  • Full advisory outlier listings are suppressed on successful runs because they are dataset-wide and mostly stable between PRs.
  • Failure runs still include a detailed log excerpt for debugging.

Key output:

## app.validate
## integrity_check.py (PR head compared with PR base)
loaded CPU=4120 GPU=2030
Integrity section Flagged lines
structural 18
CPU name/tier consistency (desktop mainstream only) 0
CPU single>multi (cinebench/geekbench — should be multi>=single) 0
CPU era-vs-score outliers 8
CPU cross-source ratio outliers (possible wrong-variant) 155
GPU cross-source ratio outliers + sanity 18

@Seungpyo1007
Seungpyo1007 merged commit f1a783e into develop Sep 25, 2026
5 checks passed
@Seungpyo1007
Seungpyo1007 deleted the data/top15-commons-images branch September 25, 2026 05:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

data Dataset changes enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Massive dataset rebuild: CPU + brand + GPU + smartphone + SoC (1989-2026)

2 participants