-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 562
docs: add more visibility to trust.flagsmith.com #8328
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| title: Security & Compliance - FAQ | ||
| sidebar_label: Security & Compliance | ||
| sidebar_position: 8 | ||
| description: | ||
| Flagsmith security and compliance FAQ - SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, penetration tests, sub-processors and security | ||
| questionnaires. | ||
| keywords: | ||
| - SOC 2 | ||
| - SOC2 | ||
| - ISO 27001 | ||
| - GDPR | ||
| - DPA | ||
| - penetration test | ||
| - sub-processors | ||
| - security questionnaire | ||
| - compliance | ||
| - trust centre | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| import Link from '@docusaurus/Link'; | ||
|
|
||
| <span id="top" /> | ||
|
|
||
| <Link to="/support/faq">← Back to FAQ</Link> | ||
|
|
||
| <div className="faq-content"> | ||
|
|
||
| Security, compliance and vendor review documentation lives in the | ||
| **[Flagsmith Trust Centre](https://trust.flagsmith.com)**. It is the single, current source | ||
| for our certifications, reports and policies — start there for any of the questions below. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Is Flagsmith SOC 2 certified? | ||
|
|
||
| Yes, Flagsmith is SOC 2 Type 2 certified. Request the report through the | ||
| [Trust Centre](https://trust.flagsmith.com). | ||
|
Comment on lines
+33
to
+36
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -eu
printf '%s\n' '--- security-compliance.mdx ---'
sed -n '1,60p' docs/docs/support/faq/security-compliance.mdx
printf '%s\n' '--- account-billing-organisation.mdx ---'
sed -n '50,85p' docs/docs/support/faq/account-billing-organisation.mdx
printf '%s\n' '--- FAQ index references ---'
sed -n '60,90p' docs/docs/support/faq/index.mdx
printf '%s\n' '--- repository references to SOC 2 and Trust Centre ---'
rg -n -i 'SOC 2|SOC2|Trust Centre|trust\.flagsmith\.com|ISO 27001' docs README.md .github 2>/dev/null | head -200Repository: Flagsmith/flagsmith Length of output: 7047 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -eu
for url in \
'https://trust.flagsmith.com' \
'https://trust.flagsmith.com/faq#1-security-governance' \
'https://trust.flagsmith.com/faq'
do
printf '\n--- %s ---\n' "$url"
curl -L --max-time 20 -sS "$url" | \
tr '\n' ' ' | \
sed -E 's/<script[^>]*>.*<\/script>//g; s/<style[^>]*>.*<\/style>//g; s/<[^>]+>/ /g; s/[[:space:]]+/ /g' | \
grep -Eio '.{0,180}(SOC ?2|SOC2|Type ?[12]|attestation|certif|examination|report).{0,300}' | \
head -40 || true
done
printf '\n--- public repository references and history summary ---\n'
rg -n -i 'SOC 2|SOC2|Type II|Type 2|attestation|examination report|certif' . \
-g '!node_modules' -g '!build' -g '!dist' | head -250
git log --oneline -20 -- docs/docs/support/faq/security-compliance.mdx docs/docs/support/faq/account-billing-organisation.mdx docs/docs/support/faq/index.mdxRepository: Flagsmith/flagsmith Length of output: 4248 🌐 Web query:
💡 Result: Flagsmith is a fully accredited SOC 2 Type 2 organization [1][2][3][4]. As of August 2026, the company maintains this certification [5][4], and copies of their audit report are available to interested parties upon request through their official communication channels [2][3][6]. In addition to SOC 2 Type 2, the company also maintains ISO 27001 certification [4]. Citations:
🌐 Web query:
💡 Result: A SOC 2 examination is an attestation engagement performed by an independent service auditor to evaluate an organization’s controls [1][2]. It is critical to note that there is no such thing as a SOC 2 "certification" [1][2]. The output of this engagement is a formal attestation report, not a certificate [1][2]. The terminology "Type 2" refers to a specific type of SOC 2 examination report [3]. The distinction between Type 1 and Type 2 reports lies in the scope and duration of the assessment [1][3]: Type 1 Report: An examination of the design and implementation of an organization's controls at a specific point in time [1][3]. Type 2 Report: An examination of the design, implementation, and operating effectiveness of an organization's controls over a specified period (typically 6 to 12 months) [1][3]. A SOC 2 Type 2 report includes the following core components [4]: Management’s assertion regarding the system and controls [4]. A description of the service organization’s system [4]. The service auditor’s opinion on the fairness of the description, the suitability of the design of controls, and the operating effectiveness of those controls throughout the specified period [4][3]. The specific tests of controls performed by the auditor and the results of those tests [4]. Because a SOC 2 engagement results in a report rather than a certification, organizations should not use terms like "SOC 2 Certified" in their marketing or communications [1][2]. Proper usage involves stating that an organization has "obtained a SOC 2 Type 2 report" or has "successfully completed a SOC 2 Type 2 examination" [1][2]. Citations:
🌐 Web query:
💡 Result: SOC 2 Type 2 is a compliance certification that verifies an organization's internal controls and processes related to information security over a specific period of time [1]. While SOC 2 Type 1 evaluates the design of an organization's security controls at a single point in time, SOC 2 Type 2 assesses whether those controls are not only designed correctly but also operating effectively over a sustained duration [2]. This makes Type 2 a more rigorous standard, as it provides evidence that the organization's security and data protection processes perform as intended during daily operations [2]. SOC 2 compliance, in general, focuses on organizational processes—such as software patching, access management, and vulnerability scanning—to ensure data security [1]. Organizations often pursue SOC 2 Type 2 certification to demonstrate their security maturity to customers and stakeholders, particularly in regulated industries where verifying operational security is a key requirement [2][3][4]. Citations:
🌐 Web query:
💡 Result: A SOC 2 Type 2 report is an attestation of an organization's security controls over a specific period, typically covering how those controls operated in practice [1]. While a SOC 2 Type 1 report assesses the design of security controls at a single point in time, a SOC 2 Type 2 report evaluates both the design and the operational effectiveness of those controls over an extended duration, often spanning several months [1]. This allows auditors to verify that the controls not only exist but have been consistently applied throughout the observation period [1]. Organizations undergo SOC 2 Type 2 audits to demonstrate their commitment to data security and to meet the compliance requirements often requested by enterprise clients during procurement and partnership processes [2][1]. Obtaining this certification involves working with auditors to review system security, control implementation, and overall risk management practices [2][1]. Citations: Use accurate SOC 2 terminology across both FAQ entries. SOC 2 produces an attestation report, not a certification. Replace “SOC 2 certified” with wording such as “completed a SOC 2 Type 2 examination” and “obtained a SOC 2 Type 2 report” in both files. Update the FAQ index anchor if the heading changes. 📍 Affects 2 files
|
||
|
|
||
| ### How does Flagsmith handle GDPR and data processing agreements? | ||
|
|
||
| Our privacy documentation, including the DPA and the list of sub-processors, is available through the | ||
| [Trust Centre](https://trust.flagsmith.com). | ||
|
|
||
| ### Can you complete our vendor security questionnaire? | ||
|
|
||
| Check the [Trust Centre FAQ](https://trust.flagsmith.com/faq#1-security-governance) first — most questionnaires can be answered in full from the | ||
| documentation published there, which is faster than a manual review. If something is still outstanding, contact | ||
| [support@flagsmith.com](mailto:support@flagsmith.com). | ||
|
|
||
| ### How do I report a security vulnerability? | ||
|
|
||
| See [CVEs and Vulnerabilities](/support/cves-and-vulnerabilities) for how to report an issue and the remediation SLAs we | ||
| work to. Do not report vulnerabilities through public GitHub issues. | ||
|
|
||
| **Related documentation:** [Help and Support](/support#security-and-compliance) | ||
|
|
||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| ## Related FAQ Categories | ||
|
|
||
| - [Account, Billing & Organisation](/support/faq/account-billing-organisation) - Questions about accounts, SSO and | ||
| billing | ||
| - [Open Source & Self-Hosted](/support/faq/open-source-self-hosted) - Questions about self-hosting and the Enterprise | ||
| Edition | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -80,7 +80,20 @@ depending on your issue type. | |
| - **In-app chat** - Click the support widget in the Flagsmith dashboard | ||
| - **Email** - [support@flagsmith.com](mailto:support@flagsmith.com) | ||
| - **Community** - [Discord](https://discord.gg/hFhxNtXzgm) | ||
| - **Trust Centre** - [trust.flagsmith.com](https://trust.flagsmith.com) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Security and Compliance | ||
|
|
||
| Security questionnaires, compliance documentation and our SOC 2 Type 2 report are handled through the | ||
| **[Flagsmith Trust Centre](https://trust.flagsmith.com)** rather than the support channels above. Go there to: | ||
|
|
||
| - Review our security posture, certifications and sub-processors | ||
| - Request access to compliance reports and policies | ||
| - Complete or shortcut a vendor security review | ||
|
|
||
| Common questions about SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and vendor security reviews are answered in the | ||
| [Security & Compliance FAQ](/support/faq/security-compliance). | ||
|
|
||
| To report a security vulnerability, see [CVEs and Vulnerabilities](./cves-and-vulnerabilities.md). | ||
|
Comment on lines
+84
to
+96
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win Make the questionnaire routing consistent. This section says questionnaires are handled through the Trust Centre rather than support channels. However, the Security & Compliance FAQ tells users to contact |
||
|
|
||
| ### Enterprise Support | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Align all ISO 27001 references with the actual FAQ scope. The navigation advertises ISO 27001, but the target page does not document it.
docs/docs/support/faq/security-compliance.mdx#L5-L18: add an ISO 27001 status/scope answer or remove the topic from the metadata.docs/docs/support/faq/index.mdx#L77-L82: update the category description if the FAQ content is not expanded.docs/docs/support/faq/account-billing-organisation.mdx#L75-L76: update the related-category description to match the final FAQ scope.📍 Affects 3 files
docs/docs/support/faq/security-compliance.mdx#L5-L18(this comment)docs/docs/support/faq/index.mdx#L77-L82docs/docs/support/faq/account-billing-organisation.mdx#L75-L76There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bakirFS this is legitimate. We are not ISO27001 so please remove all references to it.