Add executed RMS-to-OPM Flow, ERT, and NeqSim notebook - #147
Merged
Conversation
EvenSol
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 31, 2026 21:37
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
ensemble_experiment; every realization launches a real OPM Flow simulation and the notebook analyzes ensemble pressure, injection, and water-front responses.Data and licensing boundary
The geological data are public Reek exports from
equinor/xtgeo-testdata, pinned to commitcad17f24e22c19c6cefe6f647185395cc0a11add(LGPL-3.0). The source readme identifies the originating RMS project. The notebook uses exported ROFF artifacts only; a production agent would call a separately licensed and governed RMS worker.Executed results
1f7a01b06307d9d56451e43bb8d6023d28d14007; the notebook records the built JAR digest and verifies the loaded-class origin.Validation
Review note
This is a draft so maintainers can review the teaching assumptions—especially the property-upscaling comparison—and the proposed production RMS-worker governance contract before merge.