Skip to content

WIP: solve OEIS A261865 Problem 13 - #103

Closed
DomTheDeveloper wants to merge 8 commits into
mainfrom
solve-oeis-a261865
Closed

WIP: solve OEIS A261865 Problem 13#103
DomTheDeveloper wants to merge 8 commits into
mainfrom
solve-oeis-a261865

Conversation

@DomTheDeveloper

@DomTheDeveloper DomTheDeveloper commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Superseded by draft PR #99, which contains the same torus Weyl infrastructure plus the exact OEIS A261865 statement, the interval/fractional-part equivalence, and the square-factor reduction. This duplicate is closed to keep one canonical research branch. No solved claim is made.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 This is an automated welcome message. 🤖
Thanks for the contributions!

A few friendly reminders while the review gets started:

  • Please take a look at the style guidelines,
    especially the conventions for references, categories, AMS tags, and answer(sorry).
  • You can manage some PR labels by leaving a comment with +label-name or -label-name; for example, +awaiting-author or -awaiting-author.
  • This repository is mainly for formalised statements. Proofs longer than about 25-50 lines are usually out of scope; longer proofs are welcome to be included/linked via the formal_proof mechanism.

Thanks again for helping improve Formal Conjectures.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant