You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am developing a project that needs the PID class to be inherited or prototyped, what is not allowed with a class with no default constructor. I am using PID_v1 and I had to modify the library in order to create a default constructor, but I am not comfortable using non-standard libraries. I want my code to be as compatible as possible with the tools available to the community, so people can use my work as I use the work of others.
I thought about creating a branch on PID-v1 and ask for a pull request of my version, but that project is kind of abandoned.
Is it possible to include a default constructor in QuickPID? I would gladly do it myself if I was allowed to create a branch and them request a pull.
Added default constrictor - new version published (QuickPID 3.1.3)
Converting to discussion ... let me know if the update is suitable, or if any changes are needed.
Thanks,
dlloyd
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Jan 6, 2023
Activity
Dlloydev commentedon Jan 6, 2023
Is it possible to include a default constructor in QuickPID?
Yes. Were you needing something like this?
I would also consider a pull request ... or could just publish this as an update with new version (QuickPID 3.1.3)
Dlloydev commentedon Jan 6, 2023
Added default constrictor - new version published (QuickPID 3.1.3)
Converting to discussion ... let me know if the update is suitable, or if any changes are needed.
Thanks,
dlloyd