Enforce access checks on mutating routes + add coverage guard - #2334
Enforce access checks on mutating routes + add coverage guard#2334ruizhang0519 wants to merge 36 commits into
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for thriving-cassata-78ae72 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
d2d4900 to
ffc3e61
Compare
ffc3e61 to
3c8787d
Compare
|
|
||
| @router.post("/namespaces/{namespace}/", status_code=HTTPStatus.CREATED) | ||
| async def create_node_namespace( | ||
| async def create_or_reactivate_namespace( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can this be moved into an internal/namespaces.py?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Moved it to internal/namespaces.py, next to create_namespace. Also dropped the JSONResponse return so HTTP shaping stays in the endpoint — it now returns a NamespaceWriteResult (created / reactivated / already_exists). Status codes and bodies unchanged.
Already-exists returns a status rather than raising, since register_* discard the result and just need the namespace to exist. Added a test to pin that.
| @@ -24,8 +24,10 @@ | |||
| from datajunction_server.internal.access.authentication.http import SecureAPIRouter | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, so after some stress testing found an issue. upsert_materialization never checks WRITE on node_name.
create_new_materialization sends transforms and dimensions through build_non_cube_materialization_config, which is not passed an access_checker, and the DRUID_CUBE job through build_cube_materialization, which also does not check. The only branch that reaches .check() is the non-DRUID cube job, and that check is READ on the cube's metrics and dimensions, not WRITE on the node being materialized. So there is no WRITE gate on this endpoint for any node type.
Quick Example:
Let's say Restrictive RBAC governs finance; Alice has no grant on it.
POST /nodes/finance.orders/materializations/{name}/backfill returns 403
POST /nodes/finance.orders/materialization with a valid transform body returns 201: DJ writes the materialization, records history, and schedules the workflow. Because upsert updates in place, Alice can also overwrite the owner's existing config and reschedule it.
Suggested fix:
Add access_checker.add_request_by_node_name(node_name, ResourceAction.WRITE) and await access_checker.check(on_denied=AccessDenialMode.RAISE) at the top of the handler, matching deactivate and backfill.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch — confirmed and fixed: added the WRITE check at the top of upsert_materialization, matching deactivate and backfill.
I also added a completeness test: every mutating route now needs a denial test or an explicit backlog entry. The denial suite is up to 21 cases (including a deny-DELETE variant), with 42 routes backlogged with reasons.
…9/dj into enforcement-coverage
|
OK- some small bugs/findings from an agent stress test:
Examples: Alice has WRITE on finance., which lets her write nodes under finance. When she creates finance.sub, the endpoint checks WRITE on finance. Since finance. does not match finance, she gets a 403. Giving her exact access to finance fixes namespace creation but no longer covers nodes below it. Alice can still create the namespace through register_table, which checks finance.sub. That matches finance.*. The namespace is committed before catalog validation, so a request such as Creating a.b.c.d with include_parents=true authorizes only a.b.c, even though it also creates a and a.b. |
|
The PR description is a bit confusing/roundabout- I think clearer is something like: This PR adds missing WRITE authorization checks to namespace creation/reactivation, cube mutations, materialization configuration, preaggregation mutations, and dimension-link removal. It also fixes materialization upserts that previously checked READ on related metrics instead of WRITE on the node being changed. It adds two regression guards: one verifies every mutating HTTP route reaches AccessChecker.check() or has a documented exclusion; the other verifies covered routes reject denied writes. These checks remain permissive until restrictive RBAC is enabled. (Then explicit examples) |
|
One other quick thing- for these PRs, I find it not very helpful to have unit test coverage in pr description- that is tablestakes and also part of the CI checks. Instead, I feel more effective is the structure of having an explicit runthrough of a case that fails pre-pr, and an explicit run through of the same case after the pr. That will help give the reviewer a better feel for what the change is doing and why. |
Good call and both updated. 1. The register route now resolves grain groups once, with 2. Namespace creation now authorizes the namespaces it creates rather than the parent, matching node creation and |
|
Also updated PR description |
This PR adds missing WRITE authorization checks to namespace creation/reactivation, cube mutations, materialization configuration, preaggregation mutations, and dimension-link removal. It also fixes materialization upserts that previously checked READ on related metrics instead of WRITE on the node being changed.
It adds two regression guards: one verifies every mutating HTTP route reaches
AccessChecker.check()or has a documented exclusion; the other verifies covered routes reject denied writes. These checks remain permissive until restrictive RBAC is enabled.Tracking: #2234 (step 0).
Runthrough
Local server,
AUTHORIZATION_PROVIDER=rbac,DEFAULT_ACCESS_POLICY=restrictive.aliceis a non-admin whose only grant isWRITEon namespacefinance.*. Same database, same requests,mainon one port and this branch on the other.1. Materializing a node she has no grant on
main:
The 500 is the unreachable local query service: the request had already passed authorization and begun scheduling the job. With a query service configured this returns 201, writes the materialization config, and — since upsert updates in place — can overwrite the owner's existing config.
this PR:
2. Creating a namespace outside her scope
main:
this PR:
3. Her actual grant still works
this PR:
Authorization targets the namespace being created, so a
finance.*scope coversfinance.sub. Checking the parent instead would deny it, becausefinance.*does not matchfinance.Notes
POST /preaggs/{id}/availabilityis deliberately excluded: it is a query-service callback rather than a user action, so governing it with userWRITEwould break callbacks. It needs a service-identity model.Why this is a no-op today: the default access policy is permissive, so these checks allow requests unless an explicit restrictive grant or policy denies them. They take effect once a deployment enables restrictive RBAC.
Out of scope, tracked as step-0 follow-ups: authorization on non-HTTP (deployment and background) paths, the
availabilityservice-identity model, and denial tests for the routes still listed in the backlog.