Skip to content

update example Cisco Secure Web Appliance - #23218

Closed
san-jos wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
sandra.josy/fa-cisco-example
Closed

san-jos wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
sandra.josy/fa-cisco-example

Conversation

@san-jos

@san-jos san-jos commented Apr 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ The qa/skip-qa label has been added with shippable changes

The following files, which will be shipped with the agent, were modified in this PR and
the qa/skip-qa label has been added.

You can ignore this if you are sure the changes in this PR do not require QA. Otherwise, consider removing the label.

List of modified files that will be shipped with the agent
cisco_secure_web_appliance/datadog_checks/cisco_secure_web_appliance/data/conf.yaml.example

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: fbf3c79667

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread cisco_secure_web_appliance/assets/configuration/spec.yaml
@chouetz chouetz added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Oct 2, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Validation Report

All 21 validations passed.

Show details
Validation Description Status
agent-reqs Verify check versions match the Agent requirements file ✅
ci Validate CI configuration and code coverage settings ✅
codeowners Validate every integration has a CODEOWNERS entry ✅
config Validate default configuration files against spec.yaml ✅
dep Verify dependency pins are consistent and Agent-compatible ✅
http Validate integrations use the HTTP wrapper correctly ✅
imports Validate check imports do not use deprecated modules ✅
integration-style Validate check code style conventions ✅
jmx-metrics Validate JMX metrics definition files and config ✅
labeler Validate PR labeler config matches integration directories ✅
legacy-signature Validate no integration uses the legacy Agent check signature ✅
license-headers Validate Python files have proper license headers ✅
licenses Validate third-party license attribution list ✅
metadata Validate metadata.csv metric definitions ✅
models Validate configuration data models match spec.yaml ✅
openmetrics Validate OpenMetrics integrations disable the metric limit ✅
package Validate Python package metadata and naming ✅
qa-label Validate the pull request declares whether it needs QA for the next Agent release ✅
readmes Validate README files have required sections ✅
saved-views Validate saved view JSON file structure and fields ✅
version Validate version consistency between package and changelog ✅

View full run

@gh-worker-devtools-f43747
gh-worker-devtools-f43747 Bot deleted the sandra.josy/fa-cisco-example branch October 8, 2026 03:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants