Skip to content

Answer review comment on group size in survey #215

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
dokempf merged 2 commits into from
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

Answer review comment on group size in survey #215

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
1425be8
Answer review comment on group size in survey
dokempf Jul 3, 2026
eee436e
Remove sufficiently
dokempf Jul 3, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion review_answers/review_2_answers.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ The actual number of core modules is not important since we expect RSE units to
### Comment 18
> You identify two archetypes: those with development services and those without. But you did not collect data on unit size. Larger units may offer more services simply because they have more staff. Acknowledge this confounding factor.

**Answer:**
**Answer:** The manuscript already contains this paragraph which in our view highlights the issue: "We should note however, that our survey did not collect information about the size of the RSE unit. It is likely that the RSE units offering development services are also larger in size, and that their total resource commitment to teaching and consultation services is similar to that of those RSE units that do not offer development services."


---

Expand Down
Loading