Skip to content

Decisions go to the user; fewer false open items - #19

Merged
ChakraFusion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/ask-user-on-decision
Oct 6, 2026
Merged

ChakraFusion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/ask-user-on-decision

Conversation

@ChakraFusion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

From the 2026-10-06 HiddenSync run:

  • NEEDS_DECISION / BLOCKED: lead asked whether to implement WGC capture or accept a gap; Hawk sent no question and 21 min later injected its standard "The user has approved all pending plans" prompt, which decided the question in the user's place. Now the question goes to the user once (ntfy, answerable by reply), and Hawk injects nothing until an answer arrives (an answer after the question resumes the normal flow).
  • False open items: done claims were sent back for lines like | S1 | ✅ complete | Shipable gaps (8 phases) |. A line reporting a finished item now counts as open only with a clear open signal (13/21, not/pending/partial/limitation, ❌, ⚠).

Tests: needs_decision_asks / _waits, blocked_asks, decision_answered, done_open_completed_lines (69/69).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

2026-10-06 HiddenSync run:
- lead stopped with STOP: NEEDS_DECISION (implement WGC capture or accept the
  gap?); Hawk sent no question and 21 min later injected its standard prompt
  ("The user has approved all pending plans"), which settled the scope
  decision in the user's place. Now NEEDS_DECISION / BLOCKED is sent to the
  user once (ntfy, answerable by reply) and nothing is injected until an answer.
- done claims were sent back for "| S1 | complete | Shipable gaps (8 phases) |":
  a line that reports a finished item counts as open only with a clear open
  signal (a count below its total, not/pending/partial/limitation, a cross or
  warning sign).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ChakraFusion
ChakraFusion merged commit 7dbe354 into main Oct 6, 2026
8 checks passed
@ChakraFusion
ChakraFusion deleted the fix/ask-user-on-decision branch October 6, 2026 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant