Skip to content

change(base): add new relations for 787 - #575

Merged
kpsherva merged 1 commit into
CERNDocumentServer:masterfrom
zubeydecivelek:faser-update
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

change(base): add new relations for 787#575
kpsherva merged 1 commit into
CERNDocumentServer:masterfrom
zubeydecivelek:faser-update

Conversation

@zubeydecivelek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

},
"draft": {
"relation_type": {"id": "references"},
"resource_type": {"id": "publication-other"},

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe in this case proposal would be better, WDYT @zzacharo ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmmm but proposal means something right? I write a proposal.... honestly draft should not affect the resource type i.e it should already be the final resource type that would be there after the last publication step

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should I ask curators to put correct resource type?

},
"draft": {
"relation_type": {"id": "references"},
"resource_type": {"id": "publication-other"},

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what resource type we can use for this? publication-other is okay?

this is the example record: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2928031

@kpsherva
kpsherva merged commit a37a8cf into CERNDocumentServer:master Aug 12, 2026
3 checks passed
@zubeydecivelek zubeydecivelek moved this to In review 🔍 in Sprint Q3 2026 ☀️ Aug 12, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In review 🔍 to To release 🤖 in Sprint Q3 2026 ☀️ Aug 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants