[Upd4ting]

Why

Module authors read the TSDoc of ProcessCallback, SetParameterProvider and AddParameterModifier to learn what the decorators accept and when they fail. Since #67 that TSDoc lagged the code. The @throws of ProcessCallback named only the @Connection case. @param target Controller class was wrong on all three, because the target is the decorated prototype and the code reads target.constructor. docs/2.controllers.md and UPGRADING.md already describe the behaviour; this brings the published declarations in line. ANT-1812.

What changes

• ProcessCallback lists each TypeError it throws: a descriptor with no value, a class Controller did not create (a static method lands here, since its target is the class and the constructor is Function), a symbol key with no location, and @Connection outside websocket or monitor mode.
• @param target on the three functions describes the decorator target as the prototype whose constructor is the controller class.

Comment-only. No code, test or emitted JavaScript changes.

Proof

Each documented throw, observed against the built dist with a probe calling ProcessCallback directly (the @Connection case is already covered by the suites):

noValue:    TypeError: Route decorators apply to methods; m has no value
plainClass: TypeError: Route decorators apply to Controller classes; Plain has no location
static:     TypeError: Route decorators apply to Controller classes; Function has no location
symbol:     TypeError: Route decorators on a symbol-keyed method need a location; C[Symbol(s)] has none

antelopejs-comment-proof origin/main:

Comment proof: 2 packages, 17 entries unchanged against origin/main (committed HEAD).

Suppressions in authored code files (origin/main and committed HEAD). A lint directive counts once per rule it names; * is a directive naming none.

Suppressions	base	HEAD
Lint suppressions, all rules	1	1
Lint suppressions, anti-slop/no-unknown-parameters	1	1
@ts-expect-error	1	1
@ts-ignore	0	0
SAFETY: comments	0	0
Lint config rule-offs, all rules	0	0

pnpm run checks:

Checks: 9 passed, 0 failed.