Skip to content

contract: mirror OGAR's 0xFFXX hardcoded-behaviour reservation (D-DT64-7 O2) - #1904

Merged
AdaWorldAPI merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ccr-85acaff0-oszq40-o2mirror
Nov 1, 2026
Merged

AdaWorldAPI merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ccr-85acaff0-oszq40-o2mirror

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What

  • ogar_codebook::HARDCODED_BEHAVIOUR (0xFFFF) and HARDCODED_BEHAVIOUR_DOMAIN (0xFF) mirror ogar_vocab's reservation, which merged in OGAR specs(sprint-5-6): 13-worker parallel batch + Opus meta review (governance only) #365.
  • Test no_mirrored_row_lands_in_the_hardcoded_behaviour_block:
    • no CODEBOOK row has a high byte of 0xFF;
    • no concept is named hardcoded_behaviour;
    • the domain of 0xFFFF is still Unassigned.
  • lance_graph_r2il::polyfill::HARDCODED now reads the contract constant, so 0xFFFF is spelled in one place.
  • Board updates:

Validation

  • The test was written first and failed to compile (the constants did not exist).
  • cargo test -p lance-graph-contract --lib: 1563 passed.
  • cargo test -p lance-graph-r2il: all suites pass.
  • Disable run: with ("planted_in_reserved_block", 0xFF01) added to CODEBOOK, the test fails with planted_in_reserved_block (0xff01) landed in the reserved 0xFFXX block. The file was restored with git checkout.
  • SUPERSESSION-INDEX.md was regenerated and is unchanged.

Generated by Claude Code

…T64-7 O2)

HARDCODED_BEHAVIOUR / HARDCODED_BEHAVIOUR_DOMAIN mirror ogar_vocab (OGAR #365),
with a guard that no CODEBOOK row lands in 0xFFXX. The r2il polyfill's
HARDCODED now reads the contract constant, so the value has one spelling.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XAqKMNZqKXSaeb9g2ypywF
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 4aba090a-9161-4c7e-84ad-347fbf9eadc0
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2026 01:47
@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI merged commit e9c7de5 into main Nov 1, 2026
26 checks passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-01T01:48:17.152006Z e5304db Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

AdaWorldAPI added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants