You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
authored and
Jaysinh Shukla
committed
Fix the broken footnote and the grammar in the latest draft
The footnote never worked. kramdown needs [^1] in the body, but the text had
[1], so it rendered as two literal characters and the definition was left
orphaned: its first sentence vanished from the build entirely and its second
escaped as a stray paragraph below the proofreaders credit.
The backstory in it was worth more than a footnote, so it moves to an italic
line under the title. It also said 2027, a year that has not happened and
that contradicted the 2017 two lines above it, and the gap from December 2017
to now is eight years and eight months rather than "9+".
Grammar:
- "books that I have read in 2017" and "I have read ... in 2027" — the
present perfect will not take a finished time expression.
- "a genious writer who writes satire which you highly feel relatable" —
spelling; "highly" does not modify "feel"; and you find a thing
relatable rather than feel it relatable.
- "declaring humans as their greatest enemy" — declare takes two bare
objects, as in "elect her president".
- "Mean a while" -> "Meanwhile,".
- "turns to a dictatorship" -> "turns into". "turn to" is to seek help
from; only "turn into" is transformation.
- "whatever their captain decided was in their favour" -> "decides is".
Mine, not the author's — a past-tense slip inside the literary present.
Restores the topic sentence dropped from the second paragraph. Without it the
paragraph argued for the prose being plain without ever saying so, which was
the elaboration the reviewer had asked for.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
0 commit comments