Skip to content

v3 C4: budget-compliant sequential fusion BM25→EGO #249

Description

@nikolay-e

Thesis

v2's union overshoots the budget on 8.5% of instances. The sequential variant (BM25 → EGO on the remainder) is described in v2 but never measured; in v3 it and calibrated fusion are the main rows of the table.

Implementation

Two pipeline calls: the second with budget = B − used₁ and the first pass's selected paths excluded from the candidate set. Trivial over the existing pipeline.

Honesty requirement

Two passes = double cost. Report wall-clock p50/p90 as a table column, not a footnote — this is an argument of the table.

Cross-refs: #241 (--budget is not a hard cap: cores bypass it) and #238 (per-file budget share) both distort "budget-compliant" claims and are prerequisites.

Q-class. Matrix cell 10.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions