Persona Overview
- Agent: agentic-workflows
- Personas This Run: Product Manager, Legal / Compliance, Information Worker
- Scenarios Tested: 4
- Average Quality Score: N/A
Key Findings
- Direct invocation of the "agentic-workflows" custom agent was not available from the exposed CLI surface in this environment.
- The available
agenticworkflows CLI appears focused on workflow file management (add, compile, audit, fix) rather than persona-prompted workflow design.
- All four sampled scenarios were captured as partial results with
invocation_unavailable, preserving benchmark coverage without blocking the run.
- Non-technical personas remain valuable test targets; their scenarios surfaced useful future benchmark categories for scheduled reporting, PR policy checks, and documentation hygiene.
Top Patterns
- Most selected trigger types in this run's scenario set were scheduled and pull_request automation.
- Expected tool patterns would likely center on GitHub reads, dependency/license scanners, and safe-output issue/comment actions.
- Security expectations for future evaluations should emphasize minimal permissions, restricted write paths, and avoiding unnecessary external network access.
View Scenario Coverage
- PM-1: Weekly digest of completed features grouped by customer impact —
invocation_unavailable
- PM-2: Flag release PRs missing customer-visible changelog notes —
invocation_unavailable
- LEG-1: Scan new dependencies added in PRs for non-permissive SPDX licenses —
invocation_unavailable
- IW-1: Weekly summary of stale documentation files not updated in the last 90 days —
invocation_unavailable
CLI evidence:
agenticworkflows --help listed repository-management commands only.
- A freeform prompt attempt through
agenticworkflows add . failed because the command expects structured JSON for workflow import, not custom-agent prompting.
View Areas for Improvement
- Provide a documented invocation path for the custom "agentic-workflows" agent so benchmark runs can score response quality directly.
- Add a lightweight example in
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md or related .github/aw/*.md docs showing how persona-style requests should be submitted for evaluation.
- Clarify whether the expected research surface is a CLI, workflow, or separate runtime endpoint to reduce failed exploratory calls.
Recommendations
- Document a first-class custom-agent invocation method in
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md (or the closest .github/aw/*.md guide) with one concise example request and expected response shape.
- Add benchmarking guidance for non-technical personas in
.github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.md, including common scheduled-report and policy-check scenarios.
- If direct invocation is intentionally unavailable, note that limitation explicitly in
.github/aw/*.md docs and recommend a supported alternative evaluation path.
Generated by 🎭 Agent Persona Explorer · pi · gpt54 · 8.18 AIC · ⌖ 10.9 AIC · ⊞ 7.9K · ◷
Persona Overview
Key Findings
agenticworkflowsCLI appears focused on workflow file management (add,compile,audit,fix) rather than persona-prompted workflow design.invocation_unavailable, preserving benchmark coverage without blocking the run.Top Patterns
View Scenario Coverage
invocation_unavailableinvocation_unavailableinvocation_unavailableinvocation_unavailableCLI evidence:
agenticworkflows --helplisted repository-management commands only.agenticworkflows add .failed because the command expects structured JSON for workflow import, not custom-agent prompting.View Areas for Improvement
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.mdor related.github/aw/*.mddocs showing how persona-style requests should be submitted for evaluation.Recommendations
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md(or the closest.github/aw/*.mdguide) with one concise example request and expected response shape..github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.md, including common scheduled-report and policy-check scenarios..github/aw/*.mddocs and recommend a supported alternative evaluation path.