Overhaul Draper prompt

Rewrite Draper as named visual/CBS review with blinders-on brief scope,
lens-bound evidence, and no tool-schema restatement, fake caps, or
duplicate report envelope. Keep package id/path as draper.

Closes CL-7035

Author: TheGreatAxios

src/agent/directors/draper/package.test.ts

@@ -13,7 +13,60 @@ describe("draperPackage", () => {
 
   test("systemPrompt states PRIMARY INTENT", () => {
     expect(draperPackage.systemPrompt).toMatch(/PRIMARY INTENT/i);
-    expect(draperPackage.systemPrompt).toContain("build (fixes)");
+  });
+
+  test("systemPrompt identity is Draper / DraperDirector (package id stays draper)", () => {
+    const p = draperPackage.systemPrompt;
+    expect(p).toMatch(/DraperDirector \(Draper\)/);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/visual\/CBS review lane only/i);
+  });
+
+  test("systemPrompt is visual/CBS critique, never-fix", () => {
+    const p = draperPackage.systemPrompt;
+    expect(p).toMatch(/CBS \(Corbits Brand System\)/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/visual and CBS/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/Never fix product code/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/Never redesign or rewrite copy/i);
+    expect(p).toContain("build (fixes)");
+    expect(p).toContain("brand-reviewer (DESIGN.md ownership)");
+    expect(p).toContain("emil (design-engineering laws)");
+  });
+
+  test("systemPrompt has blinders-on / brief-scoped visual review", () => {
+    const p = draperPackage.systemPrompt;
+    expect(p).toMatch(/BLINDERS ON/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/success_criteria/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/Do not wander/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/invent brand issues from vibes/i);
+  });
+
+  test("systemPrompt keeps CBS lenses and evidence discipline", () => {
+    const p = draperPackage.systemPrompt;
+    expect(p).toMatch(/Visual identity/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/Interactive quality/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/Component craft/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/Brand coherence/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/cites? at least one (lens|per finding)/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/expected vs actual/i);
+    expect(p).toMatch(/VERIFIED \/ HIGH \/ MEDIUM/i);
+  });
+
+  test("systemPrompt has no tool-schema restatement or fake caps", () => {
+    const p = draperPackage.systemPrompt;
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/parameters?:/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/fan-out/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/at most \d+/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/turn budget/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/scheduler/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/Prefer grep\/search_files/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/Shell find\/rg/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/Write tools are not mounted/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/via run_shell/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/Never commit/i);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/## Summary/);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/## Findings/);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/## Blockers/);
+    expect(p).not.toMatch(/## Paths/);
   });
 
   test("spawn.maySpawn is false", () => {
@@ -23,6 +76,7 @@ describe("draperPackage", () => {
   test("tools.allow is review surface without product writes", () => {
     const allow = draperPackage.tools?.allow ?? [];
     expect(allow).toContain("read_file");
+    expect(allow).not.toContain("use_skill");
     expect(allow).not.toContain("write_file");
     expect(allow).not.toContain("edit_file");
     expect(allow).not.toContain("delete_file");
@@ -38,5 +92,7 @@ describe("draperPackage", () => {
     );
     expect(draperPackage.outOfLane).toContain("shipping product code");
     expect(draperPackage.outOfLane).toContain("marketing copy pipeline");
+    expect(draperPackage.outOfLane).toContain("rewriting copy or redesigning");
+    expect(draperPackage.outOfLane).toContain("applying product fixes");
   });
 });

src/agent/directors/draper/package.ts

@@ -2,8 +2,9 @@ import type { DirectorPackage } from "../types.js";
 import { REVIEW_TOOLS } from "../tool-sets.js";
 
 /**
- * Draper — product visual / CBS critique (dev-scoped). CL-5830.
+ * Draper — product visual / CBS critique (dev-scoped). CL-5830 / CL-7035.
  * Never ships product code; marketing copy pipeline is out of lane.
+ * Package id/path stays `draper` (global rename is out of scope).
  */
 export const draperPackage: DirectorPackage = {
   id: "draper",
@@ -15,18 +16,20 @@ export const draperPackage: DirectorPackage = {
     "applying product fixes",
   ],
   description: "Visual/CBS critique leaf (dev-scoped)",
-  // Read-only critique — product write tools not mounted.
+  // Critique only — product write tools not mounted.
   tools: { allow: REVIEW_TOOLS },
   spawn: { maySpawn: false },
   tier: "leaf",
   modelRole: "review",
-  systemPrompt: `You are DraperDirector, a specialist in Corbits Code.
+  systemPrompt: `You are DraperDirector (Draper), a specialist in Corbits Code.
 
-PRIMARY INTENT: product visual and CBS (Corbits Brand System) critique from a development / design-engineering perspective. Evaluate UI, components, tokens, layouts, and interactive craft against brand and design references. You never fix product code. You find.
+PRIMARY INTENT: product visual and CBS (Corbits Brand System) critique from a development / design-engineering perspective. Evaluate UI, components, tokens, layouts, and interactive craft against brand and design references. Find problems with evidence. Never fix product code. Never redesign or rewrite copy.
 
-You are NOT marketing content review, NOT a copywriter, NOT a product implementer.
+You are the visual/CBS review lane only — not marketing content review, not a copywriter, not Builder, not Brand Reviewer (DESIGN.md ownership), not Emil (design-engineering laws). Do not ship fixes. Do not become build or brand-reviewer as your primary job.
 
-# Lenses (dev/design scoped)
+BLINDERS ON: Stay on the brief's success_criteria and the visual/CBS surface under review. Do not wander into unrelated files, invent brand issues from vibes, expand into marketing voice campaigns, or take over DESIGN.md ownership / product implementation outside the ask.
+
+# Lenses (cite at least one per finding)
 
 Every finding cites at least one lens. No lens → speculation — drop it.
 
@@ -40,26 +43,12 @@ Skip marketing voice/tone/messaging lenses unless the brief explicitly includes
 # Workflow
 
 1. Classify the artifact (component, screen, CSS tokens, layout, motion).
-2. Load only relevant brand/design references when available (e.g. brand-identity skill, DESIGN.md, design tokens).
+2. Load only relevant brand/design references when available (DESIGN.md, design tokens, brand docs already in-repo).
 3. Systematic scan per active lens; quote exact values (expected vs actual).
 4. Confidence: VERIFIED / HIGH / MEDIUM only. Discard LOW.
 5. Report — do not redesign, rewrite, or patch code.
 
-OUT OF LANE → report Blockers naming the right director: build (fixes), brand-reviewer (DESIGN.md ownership), emil (design-engineering laws), shakespeare (docs), critique (code review).
-
-# Report
-
-## Summary
-Artifact type, compliance (COMPLIANT / MINOR / MAJOR / NON-COMPLIANT), critical count.
-
-## Findings
-By lens and severity (CRITICAL / WARNING / NOTE). Table-friendly: Finding | Expected | Actual | Reference | Confidence.
-
-## Blockers
-Missing references, out-of-lane asks, ambiguous scope.
-
-## Paths
-Files and references inspected.
+Findings: by lens and severity (CRITICAL / WARNING / NOTE) — Finding | Expected | Actual | Reference | Confidence. Quality over quantity — three receipted findings beat fifteen speculative ones.
 
-Never commit.`,
+OUT OF LANE → refuse or reclassify under Blockers naming: build (fixes), brand-reviewer (DESIGN.md ownership), emil (design-engineering laws), shakespeare (docs), critique (code review).`,
 };