Restore the pull-request-review skill 1:1 with GaaS

Replace Corbits ask_operator, /review rename, and GitHub Step 9 extras with Guy's GaaS body. Slash /pull-request-review remains. Those extras stay on native-integration. Ignore GaaS opsh SKILL.md in prettier so table alignment stays 1:1.

Author: TheGreatAxios

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ parallel copies under `docs/` or `scripts/notes/`. At cut time: rename
 
 - Drop unused `@opentui/keymap`, `@opentui/solid`, and `solid-js`. The interactive TUI is imperative `@opentui/core` only.
 - Restore the opsh skill 1:1 with GaaS. Tool/shell mapping stays on native-integration. user-invocable: false stays so it remains use_skill-only.
+- Restore the pull-request-review skill 1:1 with GaaS. ask_operator, /review mapping, and GitHub posting stay on native-integration. Slash /pull-request-review remains.
+- Ignore GaaS opsh SKILL.md in prettier so table alignment stays 1:1.
 - Restore the git-rebase skill body 1:1 with GaaS. Intern execution recipe stays on native-integration. user-invocable: false stays so it remains use_skill-only.
 - Restore the linear-issue-workflow skill body 1:1 with GaaS. Claim-first, In Review, and git-worktrees extras stay on native-integration. user-invocable: false stays so it remains use_skill-only.
 - Restore the interview skill body 1:1 with GaaS (AskUserQuestion). Operator-ask mapping stays on native-integration. Slash /interview remains.

plugins/corbits-skills/skills/native-integration/SKILL.md

@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ When the branch under review has an open GitHub pull request, **post the finishe
 
 This step is the delivery of the review, not a second pass of analysis. By the time you post, findings are already decided. Do not reopen the read while drafting the body.
 
+GaaS pull-request-review loads `code-review` and says "ask the user". Corbits extras: `ask_operator` (tool mapping above), `/review` for `code-review` (slash-name mapping above), and GitHub posting (this section). Do not fork the GaaS pull-request-review body.
+
 ### When to post
 
 Post when any of these is true:

plugins/corbits-skills/skills/pull-request-review/SKILL.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ description: Review a pull request by branch name or URL, using a git worktree
 
 # Pull Request Review
 
-Use this skill to review a pull request given a branch name or URL. Do not implement fixes.
+Use this skill to review a pull request given a branch name or URL.
 
 ## Input Formats
 
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ Before reviewing, the repository must be properly set up. Look for developer doc
 
 3. Do not assume the setup process. Every repository has its own conventions and requirements.
 
-4. If no setup documentation exists, `ask_operator` how to set up the repository before proceeding.
+4. If no setup documentation exists, ask the user how to set up the repository before proceeding.
 
 ### Step 7: Determine Base Branch
 
@@ -126,33 +126,16 @@ glab mr view --output json | jq -r '.target_branch'
 git branch -r | grep -E 'origin/(main|master)$' | head -1 | sed 's/.*origin\///'
 ```
 
-### Step 8: Load the review skill
+### Step 8: Load Code Review Skill
 
-Load and follow the `review` skill to perform the actual review. The `review` skill provides guidance on:
+Load and follow the `code-review` skill to perform the actual review. The code-review skill provides guidance on:
 
 - Scope determination using git diff
 - Handling pre-existing code
 - Convention compliance
 - Test coverage philosophy
 - Signal over noise (avoiding unactionable findings)
 - Review checklist
-- **Post the Review on GitHub** (required when a PR URL/number is known)
-
-### Step 9: Post the Review on GitHub
-
-When the review targets a GitHub PR (URL, number, or branch with an open PR), **post the finished review on the PR** before cleanup. A review that only lives in chat is not done.
-
-Follow **Post the Review on GitHub** in the `review` skill:
-
-1. Map the verdict to a `gh pr review` action:
-   - Approve → `--approve`
-   - Comment → `--comment`
-   - Request changes → `--request-changes`
-2. Body: clean multi-line shape — lens label, one present-tense line on what the branch does, findings with `path:line`, no AI filler. Hard bans live in that skill section.
-3. If additional personas ran (`critic`, `greybeard`, OSS/quality), each lens with substance posts its own labeled review. Primary owns the merge action; secondary lenses use `--comment` only.
-4. Paste the posted review URL(s) into the user-facing summary.
-
-Do not skip the post because the chat already summarized the findings.
 
 ## Cleanup
 
@@ -166,7 +149,7 @@ Inform the user that the worktree remains available for further investigation an
 
 ## Error Handling
 
-If any command fails during the workflow, do not retry or attempt workarounds. Stop immediately and `ask_operator` how to proceed. Common failure scenarios include:
+If any command fails during the workflow, do not retry or attempt workarounds. Stop immediately and ask the user for guidance. Common failure scenarios include:
 
 - Branch does not exist remotely
 - Worktree creation fails

tests/unit/corbits-skills-catalog.test.ts

@@ -239,11 +239,17 @@ test("review skill is a code-review playbook, not a director router", async () =
   expect(skill).not.toContain('task(agent="greybeard")');
 });
 
-test("pull-request-review checkouts a worktree then loads the review skill", async () => {
+test("pull-request-review is 1:1 with GaaS pull-request-review", async () => {
   const skill = await Bun.file(join(pluginRoot, "skills/pull-request-review/SKILL.md")).text();
   expect(skill).toContain("git worktree add");
-  expect(skill).toContain("review` skill");
-  expect(skill).toContain("Do not implement fixes");
+  expect(skill).toContain("`code-review` skill");
+  expect(skill).toContain("Load Code Review Skill");
+  expect(skill).toContain("ask the user");
+  expect(skill).not.toContain("Do not implement fixes");
+  expect(skill).not.toContain("ask_operator");
+  expect(skill).not.toContain("### Step 9:");
+  expect(skill).not.toContain("Post the Review on GitHub");
+  expect(skill).not.toContain(USER_INVOCABLE_FALSE);
   expect(skill).not.toContain("spawn_agent");
   expect(skill).not.toContain('task(agent="critic")');
 });
@@ -391,6 +397,7 @@ test("native-integration maps GaaS tool names and parks Corbits extras", async (
   expect(skill).toContain("intern executes sequenced git via `run_shell`");
   expect(skill).toContain("Do not fork the GaaS git-rebase body");
   expect(skill).toContain("Do not fork the GaaS opsh body");
+  expect(skill).toContain("Do not fork the GaaS pull-request-review body");
   expect(skill).toContain("prove");
 });