You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Several open reports identify recurring friction in running and maintaining Arc nodes. I would like to understand which operator workflow would make the greatest practical difference if prioritized first.
Please vote for the area most relevant to you. If possible, add a comment with:
your deployment type: validator, sentry/full node, public RPC, or local development;
whether you are using testnet or mainnet;
the issue or operational problem that best matches your experience.
This poll is intended only to help identify community priorities. Technical investigation and implementation details should remain in the relevant GitHub issues.
Which Arc node-operator workflow would benefit most from better tooling, documentation, and validation?
Independent-node peering and sync bootstrap
100%
RPC resilience and isolation for consensus traffic
0%
Safe shutdown and faster database recovery
0%
Diagnostics, health checks, and monitoring guidance
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Several open reports identify recurring friction in running and maintaining Arc nodes. I would like to understand which operator workflow would make the greatest practical difference if prioritized first.
Please vote for the area most relevant to you. If possible, add a comment with:
This poll is intended only to help identify community priorities. Technical investigation and implementation details should remain in the relevant GitHub issues.
1 vote ·
All reactions