Skip to content

APE 22 follow-up: Candidates for pyOpenSci trial review period #571

Description

@pllim

This has been discussed offline between me and Astropy Editors but in the spirit of transparency, I am going to create a table in this issue listing the currently active applications. As each of them accept or reject this trial period, we collectively need to update this table.

Trial period is as laid out in Step 1 of https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs/blob/main/APE22.rst#implementation and https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs/blob/main/APE22.rst#the-trial-period .

Package PR Submitter Editor Agreed to trial period (✔️ or ❌ )
pypeit #436 @profxj @hamogu
PyAutoGalaxy #491 @Jammy2211 @pllim ✔️ pyOpenSci/software-submission#235 – accepted 🎉
PyAutoLens #492 @Jammy2211 @dhomeier ✔️ pyOpenSci/software-submission#305
ZodiPy #495 @MetinSa @dhomeier ✔️ pyOpenSci/software-submission#161 – accepted 🎉
Pyxel #516 @flemmel ✔️ pyOpenSci/software-submission#262
martini #526 @kyleaoman @hamogu ✔️ pyOpenSci/software-submission#164 – accepted 🎉
Dolphot_LC #527 @whit5224 ✔️ pyOpenSci/software-submission#177
PetroFit #550 @robelgeda @dhomeier ✔️ pyOpenSci/software-submission#159 – accepted 🎉

This is a follow up of:

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions