Skip to content

Design review: generated scaffold scope and ownership #31

Description

@aatuh

Context

Generated services are app-owned code. The scaffold should provide production-conscious HTTP defaults without turning api-toolkit into the downstream product architecture.

Review paths

  • ROADMAP.md
  • docs/scaffold-first.md
  • docs/scaffold-support.md
  • docs/full-service-scaffold.md
  • docs/reference-service.md
  • examples/reference-saas-api/README.md

Questions

  • Is the split between saas-api and saas-api-full clear enough?
  • Which generated assets are useful defaults versus product-domain assumptions?
  • Where should regeneration expectations be stricter or more explicit?
  • What should never be added to generated services by default?

Desired outcome

A scope recommendation for future scaffold changes, including any non-goals that should be stronger in docs or templates.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    help wantedExtra attention is neededquestionFurther information is requested

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions