From 53af4fca6bd9f7ea19d4d367769863aeb61ad2bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominic Kempf <dominic.kempf@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 10:24:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Exmplain that we picked illustrative examples

---
 bibliography.bib                   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 paper.tex                          |  3 ++-
 review_answers/review_2_answers.md |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bibliography.bib b/bibliography.bib
index aa3187d..2222a5d 100644
--- a/bibliography.bib
+++ b/bibliography.bib
@@ -5777,3 +5777,31 @@ @online{zedifUniJena
 urldate = {2025-02-20}
 }
 
+@dataset{datapub,
+  author       = {Kempf, Dominic and
+                  Löffler, Frank and
+                  Caspart, Rene and
+                  Goth, Florian and
+                  Linxweiler, Jan and
+                  Schäfer, Philipp Matthias and
+                  Speck, Robert and
+                  Struck, Alexander and
+                  Ankenbrand, Markus and
+                  Castro, Leyla Jael and
+                  Ehlert, Iris and
+                  Grad, Jean-Noël and
+                  Hagdorn, Magnus and
+                  Loewe, Axel and
+                  Schlottke-Lakemper, Michael and
+                  Schmitt, Uwe and
+                  Sommer, Philipp S.},
+  title        = {Developing central Research Software Engineering
+                   units in German research institutions: materials
+                  },
+  month        = aug,
+  year         = 2025,
+  publisher    = {Zenodo},
+  version      = {1.0.0},
+  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.16939089},
+  url          = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16939089},
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 1a74e06..bb3538e 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -464,7 +464,8 @@ \section{Existing Implementations}%
 
 A number of successful RSE units have already been established in Germany and many more exist in other countries, especially the UK and the US\@.
 In order to understand the service portfolio of these existing RSE units, we conducted a small survey that received a total of twelve responses from Germany, the UK and the US\@.
-We asked RSE units for the composition of their service portfolio --- the results are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:survey}.
+We asked RSE units for the composition of their service portfolio --- a number of illustrative examples from the results are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:survey}.
+The interested reader finds the full data we received in~\cite{datapub}.
 
 From the gathered data and the additional free text information of the participants, we conclude that the service components that we have identified in Section~\ref{sec:vision} are indeed relevant for existing RSE units.
 Additionally, we see a large diversity in the weighting of these components, which is to be expected given the different environments of the RSE units.
diff --git a/review_answers/review_2_answers.md b/review_answers/review_2_answers.md
index 4092808..ef9b1e4 100644
--- a/review_answers/review_2_answers.md
+++ b/review_answers/review_2_answers.md
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ The actual number of core modules is not important since we expect RSE units to
 ### Comment 17
 > Figure 1 compares four units (Jena, Heidelberg, Reading, Princeton). But your text says you received twelve responses. Why show only four? Explain the selection criteria.
 
-**Answer:**
+**Answer:** We clarified that we hand-picked illustrative examples for the figure. At the same time, we mention that the interested reader finds the full data in the accompanying data publication on Zenodo.
 
 ---