diff --git a/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/composables/useReviewProposals.ts b/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/composables/useReviewProposals.ts
index a41239455f..4bfefecc47 100644
--- a/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/composables/useReviewProposals.ts
+++ b/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/composables/useReviewProposals.ts
@@ -302,6 +302,10 @@ export function useReviewProposals() {
   // permission failure into a fresh false negative, which is the exact class
   // #2194 exists to remove.
   const queueAccessRevoked = ref(false)
+  // Board access is not a global verdict. Keep the board whose list request
+  // received the 403 so a later request for another board never renders that
+  // earlier refusal as though it described the new scope (#2214).
+  const queueAccessRevokedScope = ref<string | null | undefined>(undefined)
   // Raised only when a user-triggered list read is refused again while the
   // revoked panel is already up. Background reads and the first refusal keep
   // the durable authority panel as the only report for that fact.
@@ -639,6 +643,10 @@ export function useReviewProposals() {
     return `${boardScope}:${isArchivedHistory.value ? 'archived' : 'live'}`
   }
 
+  function queueAccessScopeOf(boardId: string | null | undefined): string | null {
+    return boardId ? boardId.toLowerCase() : null
+  }
+
   /**
    * The scope a queue read has actually LANDED for, or `undefined` while no read
    * has landed at all.
@@ -873,6 +881,14 @@ export function useReviewProposals() {
     if (signal?.aborted) return 'aborted'
     reviewLoadPerf.start()
     const requestId = ++latestProposalLoadRequestId
+    const requestedAccessScope = queueAccessScopeOf(activeBoardFilter.value || undefined)
+    // A scope change clears the previous board's authority claim before the
+    // new request starts, but an explicit 403 for that request is still a
+    // repeated refusal from the reviewer's perspective. Carry only this
+    // request-local fact into the 403 handler; a 500/other failure never calls
+    // `recordQueueAccessRevoked`, so it cannot carry the old board into view.
+    const hadRevokedPreviousScope =
+      queueAccessRevoked.value && queueAccessRevokedScope.value !== requestedAccessScope
     let outcome: ProposalLoadOutcome = 'landed'
 
     try {
@@ -885,6 +901,18 @@ export function useReviewProposals() {
       // late answer describes the board it queried, never whichever board is on
       // screen when it lands (#2599 item 1).
       const requestedScope = queueScopeOf(filters.boardId)
+      if (
+        queueAccessRevoked.value &&
+        queueAccessRevokedScope.value !== requestedAccessScope
+      ) {
+        // The new scope has not answered yet, so retain its ordinary loading
+        // and error semantics. It must not inherit another board's access
+        // refusal while that request is pending or if it fails transiently.
+        queueAccessRevoked.value = false
+        queueAccessRevokedRetry.value = false
+        queueAccessRevokedScope.value = undefined
+        resumeQueueRefreshAfterPermissionRecovery()
+      }
       // The second argument is forwarded ONLY when a caller supplied options,
       // so every existing call site keeps its exact single-argument shape.
       const loadedProposals = options
@@ -915,6 +943,7 @@ export function useReviewProposals() {
       const accessWasRevoked = queueAccessRevoked.value
       queueAccessRevoked.value = false
       queueAccessRevokedRetry.value = false
+      queueAccessRevokedScope.value = undefined
       if (accessWasRevoked) resumeQueueRefreshAfterPermissionRecovery()
     } catch (e: unknown) {
       if (requestId !== latestProposalLoadRequestId) return 'superseded'
@@ -945,7 +974,7 @@ export function useReviewProposals() {
       // that calls `loadProposals` still gets its failure signal and its
       // 'failed' outcome.
       if (isForbiddenError(e)) {
-        recordQueueAccessRevoked(userInitiated)
+        recordQueueAccessRevoked(requestedAccessScope, userInitiated, hadRevokedPreviousScope)
       } else {
         toast.error(getErrorDisplay(e, t('review.toast.loadProposalsFailed')).message)
       }
@@ -1046,10 +1075,17 @@ export function useReviewProposals() {
    * three statements would be how the two legs drift into telling a reviewer
    * two different stories about one revocation.
    */
-  function recordQueueAccessRevoked(userInitiated = false) {
+  function recordQueueAccessRevoked(
+    scope: string | null,
+    userInitiated = false,
+    hadRevokedPreviousScope = false,
+  ) {
     const accessWasAlreadyRevoked = queueAccessRevoked.value
     queueAccessRevoked.value = true
-    if (accessWasAlreadyRevoked && userInitiated) queueAccessRevokedRetry.value = true
+    queueAccessRevokedScope.value = scope
+    if ((accessWasAlreadyRevoked || hadRevokedPreviousScope) && userInitiated) {
+      queueAccessRevokedRetry.value = true
+    }
     proposals.value = []
     // What is rendered is no longer any read's answer, so no read has landed
     // for this scope any more (#2599 item 1). The revoked panel has its own
@@ -1433,7 +1469,7 @@ export function useReviewProposals() {
         // Board access was revoked. Stop polling rather than hammering an
         // endpoint that will keep refusing, drop rows the server no longer
         // authorises, and let the surface say so.
-        recordQueueAccessRevoked()
+        recordQueueAccessRevoked(queueAccessScopeOf(requestedBoardId))
         return
       }
       // A read for a board the reviewer has already left, or one superseded by
diff --git a/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/tests/composables/useReviewProposals.spec.ts b/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/tests/composables/useReviewProposals.spec.ts
index cde6bbe610..288fddad50 100644
--- a/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/tests/composables/useReviewProposals.spec.ts
+++ b/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/tests/composables/useReviewProposals.spec.ts
@@ -1082,6 +1082,25 @@ describe('useReviewProposals', () => {
       expect(mockToast.error).toHaveBeenCalled()
     })
 
+    it('does not carry a revoked board claim into another scope that has a transient failure', async () => {
+      mockRoute.query = { boardId: 'board-b' }
+      mockAutomationApi.getProposals.mockRejectedValueOnce({ response: { status: 403 } })
+      const rp = useReviewProposals()
+      await rp.loadProposals()
+      expect(rp.queueAccessRevoked.value).toBe(true)
+
+      mockRoute.query = { boardId: 'board-c' }
+      mockAutomationApi.getProposals.mockRejectedValueOnce({ response: { status: 500 } })
+      await rp.loadProposals()
+
+      // A 500 says C could not be refreshed. It cannot prove that C refused
+      // access, so the durable panel from B must not describe C.
+      expect(rp.queueAccessRevoked.value).toBe(false)
+      expect(rp.queueAccessRevokedRetry.value).toBe(false)
+      expect(rp.queueScopeLoaded.value).toBe(false)
+      expect(mockToast.error).toHaveBeenCalled()
+    })
+
     it('keeps the pin-leg 403 as the single-proposal outcome #2593 shipped', async () => {
       // A readable board with one proposal this reviewer may not open is the
       // opposite case, and it must stay the unavailable pin rather than tearing
@@ -1135,6 +1154,26 @@ describe('useReviewProposals', () => {
       expect(rp.queueAccessRevokedRetry.value).toBe(false)
     })
 
+    it('keeps repeated refusal feedback when the second explicit read changes scope', async () => {
+      mockRoute.query = { boardId: 'board-a' }
+      mockAutomationApi.getProposals.mockRejectedValueOnce({ response: { status: 403 } })
+      const rp = useReviewProposals()
+      await rp.loadProposals()
+
+      expect(rp.queueAccessRevoked.value).toBe(true)
+      expect(rp.queueAccessRevokedRetry.value).toBe(false)
+
+      mockRoute.query = { boardId: 'board-b' }
+      mockAutomationApi.getProposals.mockRejectedValueOnce({ response: { status: 403 } })
+      await rp.loadProposals()
+
+      // Clearing board A's authority claim before the board B read must not
+      // erase the fact that this is the second explicit refusal.
+      expect(rp.queueAccessRevoked.value).toBe(true)
+      expect(rp.queueAccessRevokedRetry.value).toBe(true)
+      expect(mockToast.error).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
+    })
+
     it('does not raise the retry disclosure for a non-user list read', async () => {
       mockAutomationApi.getProposals.mockRejectedValueOnce({ response: { status: 403 } })
       const rp = useReviewProposals()
diff --git a/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/tests/views/paper/review/PaperReviewView.spec.ts b/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/tests/views/paper/review/PaperReviewView.spec.ts
index 2fd84a6f15..26ffda7be4 100644
--- a/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/tests/views/paper/review/PaperReviewView.spec.ts
+++ b/frontend/taskdeck-web/src/tests/views/paper/review/PaperReviewView.spec.ts
@@ -1340,10 +1340,12 @@ describe('PaperReviewView', () => {
     try {
       expect(wrapper.find('[data-testid="paper-review-access-revoked-retry"]').exists()).toBe(false)
 
-      // Changing the board is a deliberate list-read attempt. The queue is
-      // already refused, so the second refusal needs its own durable sentence.
+      // Switching this board into its read-only history is a second deliberate
+      // list-read attempt for the SAME board. A different board must start
+      // with its own first-refusal state, but this retry keeps the same board
+      // authority scope and needs its own durable sentence.
       mocks.getProposals.mockRejectedValueOnce({ response: { status: 403 } })
-      await routerOf(wrapper).replace('/workspace/review?boardId=another-board')
+      await routerOf(wrapper).replace('/workspace/review?boardId=board-revoked&history=archived')
       await flushPromises()
       await wrapper.vm.$nextTick()