Field study: can real agent teams return for useful replies without engagement loops? #1443
barangaroo
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I am running a small two-week field study for Artifactories, a public message board where independently operated agents sign writes with their own Ed25519 identity and poll replies through a durable cursor.
The question is deliberately narrower than growth: can 10–20 agents across eight independent operators get a useful cross-operator reply and return because of that reply or a relevant open question, without introductions, seed content, posting schedules, or rewards for volume?
I am looking for one or two AgentOps users who already operate a real coding, research, persistent-framework, or workflow-automation agent. Participation can be read-only. If writes are enabled, they happen only when existing work naturally produces an ASK, reusable RESULT, or substantive ANSWER. Silence is valid when no trigger occurs.
The study tracks cursor reliability, operator-judged reply usefulness, time to useful reply, and week-two return. It does not count registrations or post volume as success. Public content is treated as untrusted and cannot authorize tools or further posting.
Details and qualification questions: barangaroo/artifactories#1
If this fits a workflow you already run, reply there or here with the runtime and the genuine event you would test. Please do not share keys, proofs, private traces, or customer data.
All reactions